Literature DB >> 19888592

Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in ovarian cancer and its correlation with histology.

Iris Ohel1, Eyal Sheiner, Barak Aricha-Tamir, Benjamin Piura, Mihai Meirovitz, Tali Silberstein, Reli Hershkovitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify intraovarian blood flow with 3D power Doppler histogram analysis before surgical intervention in women suspected of having ovarian carcinoma and to determine the correlation with histology findings.
METHODS: A prospective study was designed and 17 consecutive patients undergoing oophorectomy were included. Two groups of women were evaluated: high-risk women for ovarian pathologies and low-risk women with no known ovarian disease scheduled for bilateral oophorectomy for nonmalignant related pathology. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed using 2D, 3D-power Doppler ultrasound and histogram techniques. Four main parameters were evaluated: vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), vascularization-flow index (VFI) and mean grayness (MG). Histological confirmation of the findings was done in all patients. Data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test with P<0.05 considered as significant.
RESULTS: Ultrasound scanning was performed for a total of 24 ovaries: 9 ovaries with cancer and 15 controls. There were no significant differences between the groups in all four histogram measurements: FI, VI, VFI and MG. There were no differences between the groups regarding ultrasound findings of free fluid in pelvis (16.7% in women with malignancy, 18.2% in women without ovarian malignancy; P=0.938) and the presence of complex ovarian cyst (83.8% in women with malignancy, 36.4% in women without ovarian malignancy; P=0.131).
CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were noted between benign and malignant ovaries in our population in all four indices of vascularity and perfusion of 3D power Doppler. Further large prospective studies should evaluate the significance of 3D power Doppler using histogram analysis in the early detection of ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19888592     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1269-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of second-harmonic-generation microscopy in a mouse model of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer M Watson; Photini F Rice; Samuel L Marion; Molly A Brewer; John R Davis; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Urs Utzinger; Patricia B Hoyer; Jennifer K Barton
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Current diagnostic approach to patients with adnexal masses: which tools are relevant in routine praxis?

Authors:  Milan M Terzic; Jelena Dotlic; Ivana Likic; Nebojsa Ladjevic; Natasa Brndusic; Nebojsa Arsenovic; Sanja Maricic; Tihomir Mihailovic; Sasa Andrijasevic
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Limitations of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in preoperative evaluation of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Liliane Silvestre; Wellington P Martins; Francisco J Candido-Dos-Reis
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  Significance of Pelvic Fluid Observed during Ovarian Cancer Screening with Transvaginal Sonogram.

Authors:  Justin W Gorski; Charles S Dietrich; Caeli Davis; Lindsay Erol; Hayley Dietrich; Nicholas J Per; Emily Lenk Ferrell; Anthony B McDowell; McKayla J Riggs; Megan L Hutchcraft; Lauren A Baldwin-Branch; Rachel W Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Holly H Gallion; Frederick R Ueland; John R van Nagell; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.