Literature DB >> 19888497

Perception of maxillary anterior esthetics by dental professionals and laypeople and survey of gingival topography in healthy young subjects.

Ki-Yeon An1, Ju-Yeon Lee, Sung-Jo Kim, Jeom-Il Choi.   

Abstract

The perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople were compared with respect to relative gingival marginal levels of the lateral incisors, flatness of the gingival margin of central incisors and its variations in horizontal locations, and interproximal contact length relative to gingival biotype. The distribution of tooth-gingiva topography in periodontally healthy subjects was also identified. A noticeable difference was observed between dental professionals and laypeople in their perception of maxillary anterior esthetic components. Normal distribution of the topographic features of anterior teeth and gingiva delineated an intermediate biotype between those preferred by dental professionals and those preferred by laypeople. The present study clearly indicates that dental professionals and laypeople demonstrated significant differences in their perceptions of dental esthetic components. These differences may influence the decision-making process by dental professionals with respect to designing the gingival levels of lateral incisors, the horizontal gingival contours of central incisors, and the shape of interproximal contact areas. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:535-541.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19888497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  An analysis on the factors responsible for relative position of interproximal papilla in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Joo-Hee Kim; Yun-Jung Cho; Ju-Youn Lee; Sung-Jo Kim; Jeom-Il Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone.

Authors:  Hae-Lyung Cho; Jae-Kwan Lee; Heung-Sik Um; Beom-Seok Chang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Esthetic impact of gingival plastic surgery from the dentistry students' perspective.

Authors:  Erdem Ayyildiz; Enes Tan; Hakan Keklik; Zulfikar Demirtag; Ahmet Arif Celebi; Matheus Melo Pithon
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

4.  Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.

Authors:  Venera Bimbashi; Asja Čelebić; Gloria Staka; Flurije Hoxha; Sanja Peršić; Nikola Petričević
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.