Literature DB >> 19888491

Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations.

Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana1, Xavier Vela-Nebot, Maribel Segalà-Torres, Carlos Rodado-Alonso, Víctor Méndez-Blanco, Marta Mata-Bugueroles.   

Abstract

Most biomechanical studies of implant-supported restorations have not taken into account the biologic changes that occur following exposure of the implants to the oral environment. Therefore, the present finite element analysis study was designed to compare the biomechanical response of three types of implant-abutment configurations both before and after establishment of a new biologic width. The three functional units studied were: a 5-mm implant platform connected with an external hexagon to a 5-mm-diameter abutment (type 1), a 5-mm implant platform connected with an external hexagon to a 4.1-mm-diameter abutment (type 2), and a 4.8-mm implant platform connected with an internal hexagon to a 4.1-mm-diameter abutment (type 3). The type 3 design, which combined platform switching with an internal connection, exhibited the smallest distortions in stress distribution after bone modeling, and the stress was distributed over the entire contact surface most smoothly and uniformly. Bone resorption following creation of the biologic width changes the biomechanical behavior of a restoration. In this study, the two implant-abutment designs featuring a smaller-diameter abutment on a larger-diameter implant platform achieved better results than the implant featuring the same-diameter implant platform and abutment, even though their initial bio?mechanical load potential was lower. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:479-487.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19888491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

2.  Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs.

Authors:  Chun-Bo Tang; Si-Yu Liul; Guo-Xing Zhou; Jin-Hua Yu; Guang-Dong Zhang; Yi-Dong Bao; Qiu-Ju Wang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.344

3.  Biomechanical Stress Analysis of Platform Switch Implants of Varying Diameters on Different Densities of Bone.

Authors:  Sandipan Mukherjee; Shobha Rodrigues; Mahesh M; Thilak Shetty; Umesh Pai; Sharon Saldanha; Puneeth Hedge; Vignesh Kamath; Ann Sales; Prashanth Bajantri
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  Effect of Marginal Bone Integrity and Aftermarket Abutment Screws on Dental Implant Systems-A Preliminary Study with Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Wu; Ming-Hsu Tsai; Hung-Shyong Chen; Ching-Ping Lin; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Current results and trends in platform switching.

Authors:  Hadi Salimi; Omid Savabi; Farahnaz Nejatidanesh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12

6.  Comparison of the Effect of Three Abutment-implant Connections on Stress Distribution at the Internal Surface of Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Saeed Raoofi; Maryam Khademi; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Mohammad Reza Movahhedi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2013-08-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.