Yoshi F Shen1, Jarred Younger, Greg Goddard, Sean Mackey. 1. Department of oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Center for Orofacial Pain, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0768, USA. yoshi.shen.ucsf@gmail.com
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating symptoms associated with myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. METHODS:Twenty-eight subjects over the age of 18 and diagnosed with chronic myofascial pain of the jaw muscles were randomized to receive real (n = 16) or sham (n = 12) acupuncture. Prior to treatment, each subject clenched his or her teeth for 2 minutes. Acupuncture or sham acupuncture was then administered at the Hegu large intestine 4 (LI4) acupoint for 15 minutes. Real acupuncture was given by penetrating the needle through a sticky foam pad at the acupoint. Sham acupuncture was conducted by pricking the skin, without penetration, with a shortened, blunted acupuncture needle through a foam pad placed away from the acupoint. General head and neck pain ratings were obtained before and after treatment on a numerical rating scale. A mechanical pain stimulus on the masseter muscle was given before and after treatment and rated on a visual analog scale to measure pain tolerance level. Paired t tests were performed to detect significant changes in pain levels. RESULTS:Subjects receivingreal acupuncture experienced a significant reduction in jaw pain (P = .04), jaw/face tightness (P = .04), and neck pain (P = .04), and a significant increase in pain tolerance of the masseter muscle (P = .001). Subjects were not able to determine whether they received real or sham acupuncture (P = .69). No significant pain reductions were observed in the sham acupuncture group. CONCLUSION: A single acupuncture session using one acupoint at Hegu large intestine 4 significantly reduced most myofascial pain endpoints when compared to sham acupuncture.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating symptoms associated with myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects over the age of 18 and diagnosed with chronic myofascial pain of the jaw muscles were randomized to receive real (n = 16) or sham (n = 12) acupuncture. Prior to treatment, each subject clenched his or her teeth for 2 minutes. Acupuncture or sham acupuncture was then administered at the Hegu large intestine 4 (LI4) acupoint for 15 minutes. Real acupuncture was given by penetrating the needle through a sticky foam pad at the acupoint. Sham acupuncture was conducted by pricking the skin, without penetration, with a shortened, blunted acupuncture needle through a foam pad placed away from the acupoint. General head and neck pain ratings were obtained before and after treatment on a numerical rating scale. A mechanical pain stimulus on the masseter muscle was given before and after treatment and rated on a visual analog scale to measure pain tolerance level. Paired t tests were performed to detect significant changes in pain levels. RESULTS: Subjects receiving real acupuncture experienced a significant reduction in jaw pain (P = .04), jaw/face tightness (P = .04), and neck pain (P = .04), and a significant increase in pain tolerance of the masseter muscle (P = .001). Subjects were not able to determine whether they received real or sham acupuncture (P = .69). No significant pain reductions were observed in the sham acupuncture group. CONCLUSION: A single acupuncture session using one acupoint at Hegu large intestine 4 significantly reduced most myofascial pain endpoints when compared to sham acupuncture.
Authors: K K Hui; J Liu; N Makris; R L Gollub; A J Chen; C I Moore; D N Kennedy; B R Rosen; K K Kwong Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2000 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Elizabeth A Tough; Adrian R White; T Michael Cummings; Suzanne H Richards; John L Campbell Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: Alex Moroz; Brian Freed; Laura Tiedemann; Heejung Bang; Melanie Howell; Jongbae J Park Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 2.629