Literature DB >> 19887712

Monte Carlo analysis of single fiber reflectance spectroscopy: photon path length and sampling depth.

S C Kanick1, D J Robinson, H J C M Sterenborg, A Amelink.   

Abstract

Single fiber reflectance spectroscopy is a method to noninvasively quantitate tissue absorption and scattering properties. This study utilizes a Monte Carlo (MC) model to investigate the effect that optical properties have on the propagation of photons that are collected during the single fiber reflectance measurement. MC model estimates of the single fiber photon path length (L(SF)) show excellent agreement with experimental measurements and predictions of a mathematical model over a wide range of optical properties and fiber diameters. Simulation results show that L(SF) is unaffected by changes in anisotropy (g epsilon [0.8, 0.9, 0.95]), but is sensitive to changes in phase function (Henyey-Greenstein versus modified Henyey-Greenstein). A 20% decrease in L(SF) was observed for the modified Henyey-Greenstein compared with the Henyey-Greenstein phase function; an effect that is independent of optical properties and fiber diameter and is approximated with a simple linear offset. The MC model also returns depth-resolved absorption profiles that are used to estimate the mean sampling depth (Z(SF)) of the single fiber reflectance measurement. Simulated data are used to define a novel mathematical expression for Z(SF) that is expressed in terms of optical properties, fiber diameter and L(SF). The model of sampling depth indicates that the single fiber reflectance measurement is dominated by shallow scattering events, even for large fibers; a result that suggests that the utility of single fiber reflectance measurements of tissue in vivo will be in the quantification of the optical properties of superficial tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19887712     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/22/016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Effect of probe geometry and optical properties on the sampling depth for diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ricky Hennessy; Will Goth; Manu Sharma; Mia K Markey; James W Tunnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Pixel-based absorption correction for dual-tracer fluorescence imaging of receptor binding potential.

Authors:  Stephen C Kanick; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jason Gunn; Kimberley S Samkoe; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Sub-diffusive scattering parameter maps recovered using wide-field high-frequency structured light imaging.

Authors:  Stephen Chad Kanick; David M McClatchy; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Jonathan T Elliott; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Subdiffuse scattering and absorption model for single fiber reflectance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Anouk L Post; Dirk J Faber; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Ton G van Leeuwen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Algorithm for automated selection of application-specific fiber-optic reflectance probes.

Authors:  Andrew J Gomes; Vadim Backman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Optical pre-screening for laryngeal cancer using reflectance spectroscopy of the buccal mucosa.

Authors:  Oisín Bugter; Jose A Hardillo; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Arjen Amelink; Dominic J Robinson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Fiber-bundle microendoscopy with sub-diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intensity mapping for multimodal optical biopsy of stratified epithelium.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Haley M James; Amy J Powless; Joshua A Hutcheson; Mary K Dierks; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Tissue Classification Using Optical Spectroscopy Accurately Differentiates Cancer and Chronic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Robert H Wilson; Malavika Chandra; James M Scheiman; Seung Yup Lee; Oliver E Lee; Barbara J McKenna; Diane M Simeone; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mary-Ann Mycek
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Comparison between performance of single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy (SFRS) system and colposcopy: a phase III trial.

Authors:  Sanaz Hariri Tabrizi; Farah Farzaneh; Seyed Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri; Maliheh Arab; Maryamsadat Hosseini; Tahereh Ashrafganjoei; Mohammad Chehrazi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 10.  Shifting focus in optical image-guided cancer therapy.

Authors:  Stijn Keereweer; Pieter B A A Van Driel; Dominic J Robinson; Clemens W G M Lowik
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.