Danielle R Bouchard1, Ian Janssen. 1. School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. danielle.bouchard@queensu.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dynapenia (low muscle strength) and obesity are associated with an impaired physical function. It was hypothesized that older individuals with both conditions (dynapenic-obesity) would have a more impaired physical function than individuals with dynapenia or obesity alone. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 2,039 men and women aged 55 years and older from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Fat mass was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and leg strength by dynamometer. Based on fat mass and leg strength tertiles, four independent groups were identified: non-dynapenic and non-obese, obese alone, dynapenic alone, and dynapenic-obese. An objective physical function measure was obtained from a 20-foot walking speed test, whereas subjective physical function measures were obtained from five self-reported questions. RESULTS: Within both sexes, the dynapenic-obese group had a slower walking speed than the non-dynapenic and non-obese and obese-alone groups (p <or= .01) but not the dynapenic-alone group. Similarly, with the exception of the dynapenic-alone group in men, the global subjective score was lower in the dynapenic-obese group than in the non-dynapenic and non-obese and obese-alone groups (p <or= .01). By comparison to the dynapenic-obese group, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for walking disability were 0.21 (0.12-0.35) in the non-dynapenic and non-obese, 0.34 (0.20-0.56) in the obese-alone, and 0.54 (0.33-0.89) in the dynapenic-obese groups. The corresponding odds ratios for a disability based on the global subjective score were 0.20 (0.09-0.42), 0.60 (0.30-1.21), and 0.41 (0.19-0.87). CONCLUSION: Dynapenic-obesity was associated with a poorer physical function than obesity alone and in most cases with dynapenia alone.
BACKGROUND: Dynapenia (low muscle strength) and obesity are associated with an impaired physical function. It was hypothesized that older individuals with both conditions (dynapenic-obesity) would have a more impaired physical function than individuals with dynapenia or obesity alone. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 2,039 men and women aged 55 years and older from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Fat mass was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and leg strength by dynamometer. Based on fat mass and leg strength tertiles, four independent groups were identified: non-dynapenic and non-obese, obese alone, dynapenic alone, and dynapenic-obese. An objective physical function measure was obtained from a 20-foot walking speed test, whereas subjective physical function measures were obtained from five self-reported questions. RESULTS: Within both sexes, the dynapenic-obese group had a slower walking speed than the non-dynapenic and non-obese and obese-alone groups (p <or= .01) but not the dynapenic-alone group. Similarly, with the exception of the dynapenic-alone group in men, the global subjective score was lower in the dynapenic-obese group than in the non-dynapenic and non-obese and obese-alone groups (p <or= .01). By comparison to the dynapenic-obese group, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for walking disability were 0.21 (0.12-0.35) in the non-dynapenic and non-obese, 0.34 (0.20-0.56) in the obese-alone, and 0.54 (0.33-0.89) in the dynapenic-obese groups. The corresponding odds ratios for a disability based on the global subjective score were 0.20 (0.09-0.42), 0.60 (0.30-1.21), and 0.41 (0.19-0.87). CONCLUSION:Dynapenic-obesity was associated with a poorer physical function than obesity alone and in most cases with dynapenia alone.
Authors: J C Menant; F Weber; J Lo; D L Sturnieks; J C Close; P S Sachdev; H Brodaty; S R Lord Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Stephanie A Studenski; Dawn E Alley; Mario Barbagallo; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: James S Andrews; Laura Trupin; Gabriela Schmajuk; Jennifer Barton; Mary Margaretten; Jinoos Yazdany; Edward H Yelin; Patricia P Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Maren S Fragala; Dawn E Alley; Michelle D Shardell; Tamara B Harris; Robert R McLean; Douglas P Kiel; Peggy M Cawthon; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Maria T Vassileva; Vilmunder Gudnason; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Annemarie Koster; Anne Newman; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Suzanne Satterfield; Stephanie A Studenski; Anne M Kenny Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: James S Andrews; Laura Trupin; Gabriela Schmajuk; Jennifer Barton; Mary Margaretten; Jinoos Yazdany; Edward H Yelin; Patricia P Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.794