Literature DB >> 19886497

Stochastic development in biologically structured population models.

Perry De Valpine1.   

Abstract

Variation in organismal development is ubiquitous in nature but omitted from most age- and stage-structured population models. I give a general approach for formulating and analyzing its role in density-independent population models using the framework of integral projection models. The approach allows flexible assumptions, including correlated development times among multiple life stages. I give a new Monte Carlo numerical integration approach to calculate long-term growth rate, its sensitivities, stable age-stage distributions and reproductive value. This method requires only simulations of individual life schedules, rather than iteration of full population dynamics, and has practical and theoretical appeal because it ties easily implemented simulations to numerical solution of demographic equations. I show that stochastic development is demographically important using two examples. For a desert cactus, many stochastic development models, with independent or correlated stage durations, can generate the same stable stage distribution (SSD) as the real data, but stable age-within-stage distributions and sensitivities of growth rate to demographic rates differ greatly among stochastic development scenarios. For Mediterranean fruit flies, empirical variation in maturation time has a large impact on population growth. The systematic model formulation and analysis approach given here should make consideration of variable development models widely accessible and readily extendible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19886497     DOI: 10.1890/08-0703.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  3 in total

1.  Uncertainty in population growth rates: determining confidence intervals from point estimates of parameters.

Authors:  Eleanor S Devenish Nelson; Stephen Harris; Carl D Soulsbury; Shane A Richards; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A method for detecting positive growth autocorrelation without marking individuals.

Authors:  Mollie E Brooks; Michael W McCoy; Benjamin M Bolker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Incorporating variability in simulations of seasonally forced phenology using integral projection models.

Authors:  Devin W Goodsman; Brian H Aukema; Nate G McDowell; Richard S Middleton; Chonggang Xu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.