Literature DB >> 19886479

Flux of aquatic insect productivity to land: comparison of lentic and lotic ecosystems.

Claudio Gratton1, M Jake Vander Zanden.   

Abstract

Recently, food web studies have started exploring how resources from one habitat or ecosystem influence trophic interactions in a recipient ecosystem. Benthic production in lakes and streams can be exported to terrestrial habitats via emerging aquatic insects and can therefore link aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. In this study, we develop a general conceptual model that highlights zoobenthic production, insect emergence, and ecosystem geometry (driven principally by area-to-edge ratio) as important factors modulating the flux of aquatic production across the ecosystem boundary. Emerging insect flux, defined as total insect production emerging per meter of shoreline (g C x m(-1) x yr(-1)) is then distributed inland using decay functions and is used to estimate insect deposition rate to terrestrial habitats (g C x m(-2) x yr(-1)). Using empirical data from the literature, we simulate insect fluxes across the water-land ecosystem boundary to estimate the distribution of fluxes and insect deposition inland for lakes and streams. In general, zoobenthos in streams are more productive than in lakes (6.67 vs. 1.46 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1)) but have lower insect emergence to aquatic production ratios (0.19 vs. 0.30). However, as stream width is on average smaller than lake radius, this results in flux (F) estimates 2 1/2 times greater for lakes than for streams. Ultimately, insect deposition onto land (within 100 m of shore) adjacent to average-sized lakes (10-ha lakes, 0.021 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1)) is greater than for average-sized streams (4 m width, 0.002 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1)) used in our comparisons. For the average lake (both in size and productivity), insect deposition rate approaches estimates of terrestrial secondary production in low-productivity ecosystems (e.g., deserts and tundra, approximately 0.07 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1)). However, larger lakes (1300 ha) and streams (16 m) can have average insect deposition rates (approximately 0.01-2.4 g C x m(-2) x yr(-1)) comparable to estimates of secondary production of more productive ecosystems such as grasslands. Because of the potentially large inputs of emerging aquatic insects into terrestrial habitats, ecosystem processes and terrestrial consumers can be influenced by insect inputs. The relative contribution of lakes and streams to this flux will vary among landscapes depending on the number and size of these ecosystems types on the landscape.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19886479     DOI: 10.1890/08-1546.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  16 in total

1.  Fluxes of terrestrial and aquatic carbon by emergent mosquitoes: a test of controls and implications for cross-ecosystem linkages.

Authors:  Johanna M Kraus; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Influence of hydrological regime and land cover on traits and potential export capacity of adult aquatic insects from river channels.

Authors:  M J Greenwood; D J Booker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sex- and habitat-specific movement of an omnivorous semi-terrestrial crab controls habitat connectivity and subsidies: a multi-parameter approach.

Authors:  Lena Hübner; Steven C Pennings; Martin Zimmer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Shifting stream planform state decreases stream productivity yet increases riparian animal production.

Authors:  Michael P Venarsky; David M Walters; Robert O Hall; Bridget Livers; Ellen Wohl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The road to higher permanence and biodiversity in exurban wetlands.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Robert Roehm
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Cross-ecosystem bottlenecks alter reciprocal subsidies within meta-ecosystems.

Authors:  Amanda J Klemmer; Mark L Galatowitsch; Angus R McIntosh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Estimation of dispersal distances of Culex erraticus in a focus of eastern equine encephalitis virus in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Laura K Estep; Nathan D Burkett-Cadena; Geoffrey E Hill; Robert S Unnasch; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Species replacement by a nonnative salmonid alters ecosystem function by reducing prey subsidies that support riparian spiders.

Authors:  Joseph R Benjamin; Kurt D Fausch; Colden V Baxter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Riparian spiders as sentinels of polychlorinated biphenyl contamination across heterogeneous aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Johanna M Kraus; Polly P Gibson; David M Walters; Marc A Mills
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Ecosystem linkages revealed by experimental lake-derived isotope signal in heathland food webs.

Authors:  David Hoekman; Mireia Bartrons; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.