Literature DB >> 19886155

Evaluation of prehospital and emergency department systolic blood pressure as a predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Fariborz Lalezarzadeh1, Paul Wisniewski, Katie Huynh, Maria Loza, Dev Gnanadev.   

Abstract

Hypotension is a trauma activation criterion validated by multiple studies. However, field systolic blood pressures (SBP) are still met with skepticism. How significant is the role of prehospital (PH) and emergency department (ED) SBP in the patient's overall condition? A review of the trauma registry over a 5-year period was conducted. PH SBPs were stratified into four categories: severe (SBP 80 mmHg or less), moderate (81-100 mmHg), mild hypotension (101-120 mmHg), and normotension (greater than 120 mmHg). These four groups were further subcategorized into the patients who were hypotensive, SBP 90 mmHg or less in the ED, versus those that were not (SBP greater than 90 mmHg). Data for 6964 patients were analyzed. Patients with PH SBP of 80 mmHg or less compared with patients who had PH SBP of greater than 80 mmHg had higher mortality (OR, 9; 95% CI, 6.45-12.84). Patients with both PH SBP 80 mmHg or less and ED SBP 90 mmHg or less had the highest risk of mortality (50%) and highest need for emergent operative intervention (54%). PH and ED hypotension is a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality and need for emergent surgical intervention in trauma patients. Field or ED blood pressures should serve as a significant marker of the patient's condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19886155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Emergency Department Vital Signs and Outcomes After Discharge.

Authors:  Gelareh Z Gabayan; Michael K Gould; Robert E Weiss; Stephen F Derose; Vicki Y Chiu; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Poor Outcomes After Emergency Department Discharge of the Elderly: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Gelareh Z Gabayan; Michael K Gould; Robert E Weiss; Neil Patel; Kwame A Donkor; Vicki Y Chiu; Sau C Yiu; Jason P Jones; Jerome R Hoffman; Catherine A Sarkisian
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Paramedics' and pre-hospital physicians' assessments of anatomic injury in trauma patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Hetti Kirves; Lauri Handolin; Mika Niemelä; Janne Pitkäniemi; Tarja Randell
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Nontraumatic hypotension and shock in the emergency department and the prehospital setting, prevalence, etiology, and mortality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jon Gitz Holler; Camilla Nørgaard Bech; Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen; Søren Mikkelsen; Court Pedersen; Annmarie Touborg Lassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Correlation of shock index and modified shock index with the outcome of adult trauma patients: a prospective study of 9860 patients.

Authors:  Ajai Singh; Sabir Ali; Avinash Agarwal; Rajeshwar Nath Srivastava
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09

6.  Low oxygen saturation is associated with pre-hospital mortality among non-traumatic patients using emergency medical services: A national database of Thailand.

Authors:  Yuwares Sittichanbuncha; Sorrawit Savatmongkorngul; Puchong Jawroongrit; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-17

7.  Risk factors for complications and in-hospital mortality: An analysis of 19,834 open pelvic ring fractures.

Authors:  Nicholas Frane; Cesar Iturriaga; Christine Bub; Peter Regala; Gus Katsigiorgis; Michael Linn
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08-25

8.  Using the Reverse Shock Index at the Injury Scene and in the Emergency Department to Identify High-Risk Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Wei-Hung Lai; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Shao-Chun Wu; Pao-Jen Kuo; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Yi-Chun Chen; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.