BACKGROUND: Glycemic memory can be reflected by tissue accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels over various time periods poorly predicted the accumulation of different AGEs in skin biopsies. Our aim was to investigate whether HbA1c assessments can predict the change in skin AGEs during time in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We included 452 T2DM patients participating in a shared-care setting, who are screened annually for HbA1c and diabetic complications. Baseline and follow-up levels of skin AGEs were assessed with a validated noninvasive autofluorescence (AF) method, which is based on the fluorescence characteristics of certain AGEs. RESULTS: Our study population had a mean age of 65 years and 54% were female. After a mean follow-up duration of 3.3 years, linear regression analyses showed weak relationships among different assessments of HbA1c (baseline, maximum, mean, and variance of HbA1c) and skin AF at follow-up. Baseline skin AF and age were predictors of skin AF at follow-up, but diabetes duration, smoking, and creatinine were of less or no predictive value for skin AF at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our T2DM population, integrated HbA1c assessments over years poorly predict the change in skin AGE level measured by skin AF. These findings agree with results in patients with T1DM. This suggests either the need for longer exposure to glucose disturbances to change tissue AGEs or other mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, leading to AGE accumulation.
BACKGROUND: Glycemic memory can be reflected by tissue accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels over various time periods poorly predicted the accumulation of different AGEs in skin biopsies. Our aim was to investigate whether HbA1c assessments can predict the change in skin AGEs during time in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We included 452 T2DM patients participating in a shared-care setting, who are screened annually for HbA1c and diabetic complications. Baseline and follow-up levels of skin AGEs were assessed with a validated noninvasive autofluorescence (AF) method, which is based on the fluorescence characteristics of certain AGEs. RESULTS: Our study population had a mean age of 65 years and 54% were female. After a mean follow-up duration of 3.3 years, linear regression analyses showed weak relationships among different assessments of HbA1c (baseline, maximum, mean, and variance of HbA1c) and skin AF at follow-up. Baseline skin AF and age were predictors of skin AF at follow-up, but diabetes duration, smoking, and creatinine were of less or no predictive value for skin AF at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our T2DM population, integrated HbA1c assessments over years poorly predict the change in skin AGE level measured by skin AF. These findings agree with results in patients with T1DM. This suggests either the need for longer exposure to glucose disturbances to change tissue AGEs or other mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, leading to AGE accumulation.
Entities:
Keywords:
ZODIAC-9; advanced glycosylation end products; fluorescence; hemoglobin A1c; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Authors: Robbert Meerwaldt; Helen L Lutgers; Thera P Links; Reindert Graaff; John W Baynes; Rijk O B Gans; Andries J Smit Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Douwe J Mulder; Tara Van De Water; Helen L Lutgers; Reindert Graaff; Rijk O Gans; Felix Zijlstra; Andries J Smit Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: V M Monnier; O Bautista; D Kenny; D R Sell; J Fogarty; W Dahms; P A Cleary; J Lachin; S Genuth Journal: Diabetes Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: C Cerami; H Founds; I Nicholl; T Mitsuhashi; D Giordano; S Vanpatten; A Lee; Y Al-Abed; H Vlassara; R Bucala; A Cerami Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-12-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Esther G Gerrits; Helen L Lutgers; Nanne Kleefstra; Reindert Graaff; Klaas H Groenier; Andries J Smit; Rijk O Gans; Henk J Bilo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Malindu E Fernando; Robert G Crowther; Peter A Lazzarini; Kunwarjit S Sangla; Scott Wearing; Petra Buttner; Jonathan Golledge Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-06-16
Authors: Ninon Foussard; Alice Larroumet; Marine Rigo; Kamel Mohammedi; Laurence Baillet-Blanco; Pauline Poupon; Marie Monlun; Maxime Lecocq; Anne-Claire Devouge; Claire Ducos; Marion Liebart; Quentin Battaglini; Vincent Rigalleau Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-03
Authors: J Skrha; J Soupal; G Loni Ekali; M Prázný; M Kalousová; J Kvasnička; L Landová; T Zima; J Skrha Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2013-03-10 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Robert P van Waateringe; Sandra N Slagter; Melanie M van der Klauw; Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk; Reindert Graaff; Andrew D Paterson; Helen L Lutgers; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel Journal: Eur J Clin Invest Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.686