Literature DB >> 19885208

In silico simulation of long-term type 1 diabetes glycemic control treatment outcomes.

Xing-Wei Wong1, J Geoffrey Chase, Christopher E Hann, Thomas F Lotz, Jessica Lin, Aaron J Le Compte, Geoffrey M Shaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to develop (1) a safe and effective protocol for the clinical control of type 1 diabetes using conventional self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) measurements and multiple daily injections with insulin analogues, and (2) an in silico simulation tool of type 1 diabetes to predict long-term glycemic control outcomes of clinical interventions.
METHODS: The virtual patient method was used to develop a simulation tool for type 1 diabetes using data from a type 1 diabetes patient cohort (n = 40). The tool was used to test the adaptive protocol (AC) and a conventional intensive insulin therapy (CC) against results from a representative control cohort. Optimal and suboptimal basal insulin replacements were evaluated as a function of SMBG frequency in conjunction with the (AC and CC) prandial control protocols.
RESULTS: In long-term glycemic control, the AC protocol significantly decreased hemoglobin A1c in conditions of suboptimal basal insulin replacement for SMBG frequencies > or = 6/day, and reduced the occurrence of mild and severe hypoglycemia by 86-100% over controls, over all SMBG frequencies in conditions of optimal basal insulin.
CONCLUSIONS: A simulation tool to predict long-term glycemic control outcomes from clinical interventions has been developed to test a novel, adaptive control protocol for type 1 diabetes. The protocol is effective and safe compared to conventional intensive insulin therapy and controls. As fear of hypoglycemia is a large psychological barrier to glycemic control, the AC protocol may represent the next evolution of intensive insulin therapy to deliver increased glycemic control with increased safety. Further clinical or experimental validation is needed to fully prove the concept.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood glucose; compartmental models; decision support; diabetes; hyperglycemia; insulin; simulation; subcutaneous injection

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885208      PMCID: PMC2769739          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  45 in total

1.  Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo.

Authors:  L Heinemann; R Linkeschova; K Rave; B Hompesch; M Sedlak; T Heise
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Minimal model estimation of glucose absorption and insulin sensitivity from oral test: validation with a tracer method.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Andrea Caumo; Rita Basu; Robert Rizza; Gianna Toffolo; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 3.  Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Development of a clinical type 1 diabetes metabolic system model and in silico simulation tool.

Authors:  Xing-Wei Wong; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Thomas F Lotz; Jessica Lin; Aaron J Le; Geoffrey M Shaw
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

5.  A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia.

Authors:  Matthew Cohen; Erin Boyle; Carol Delaney; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  Feasibility of automating insulin delivery for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Garry M Steil; Kerstin Rebrin; Christine Darwin; Farzam Hariri; Mohammed F Saad
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs.

Authors:  Bruno Guerci; Michèle Floriot; Philip Böhme; Danielle Durain; Muriel Benichou; Stéphanie Jellimann; Pierre Drouin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Glucose appearance in the peripheral circulation and liver glucose output in men after a large 13C starch meal.

Authors:  Marion Korach-André; Hubert Roth; Didier Barnoud; Michel Péan; François Péronnet; Xavier Leverve
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  The impact of non-model-related variability on blood glucose prediction.

Authors:  Jonas Kildegaard; Jette Randløv; Jens Ulrik Poulsen; Ole K Hejlesen
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 10.  Novel insulins: expanding options in diabetes management.

Authors:  John E Gerich
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  3 in total

1.  A controlled study of the effectiveness of an adaptive closed-loop algorithm to minimize corticosteroid-induced stress hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Deborah L Branigan; Ryan G Massoud; Matthew E Breen; Peter G Jacobs; B Wayne Bequette; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  A benchmark data set for model-based glycemic control in critical care.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Aaron LeCompte; Geoffrey M Shaw; Amy Blakemore; Jason Wong; Jessica Lin; Christopher E Hann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Decision Support Systems for Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Nichole S Tyler; Peter G Jacobs
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.