Literature DB >> 19885198

Indication-based ordering: a new paradigm for glycemic control in hospitalized inpatients.

Joshua Lee1, Brian Clay, Ziband Zelazny, Gregory Maynard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inpatient glycemic control is a constant challenge. Institutional insulin management protocols and structured order sets are commonly advocated but poorly studied. Effective and validated methods to integrate algorithmic protocol guidance into the insulin ordering process are needed.
METHODS: We introduced a basic structured set of computerized insulin orders (Version 1), and later introduced a paper insulin management protocol, to assist users with the order set. Metrics were devised to assess the impact of the protocol on insulin use, glycemic control, and hypoglycemia using pharmacy data and point of care glucose tests. When incremental improvement was seen (as described in the results), Version 2 of the insulin orders was created to further streamline the process.
RESULTS: The percentage of regimens containing basal insulin improved with Version 1. The percentage of patient days with hypoglycemia improved from 3.68% at baseline to 2.59% with Version 1 plus the paper insulin management protocol, representing a relative risk for hypoglycemic day of 0.70 [confidence interval (CI) 0.62, 0.80]. The relative risk of an uncontrolled (mean glucose over 180 mg/dl) patient stay was reduced to 0.84 (CI 0.77, 0.91) with Version 1 and was reduced further to 0.73 (CI 0.66, 0.81) with the paper protocol. Version 2 used clinician-entered patient parameters to guide protocol-based insulin ordering and simultaneously improved the flexibility and ease of ordering over Version 1.
CONCLUSION: Patient parameter and protocol-based clinical decision support, added to computerized provider order entry, has a track record of improving glycemic control indices. This justifies the incorporation of these algorithms into online order management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPOE; diabetes; glycemic control; insulin; quality improvement

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885198      PMCID: PMC2769741          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rainu Kaushal; Kaveh G Shojania; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-23

2.  American College of Endocrinology position statement on inpatient diabetes and metabolic control.

Authors:  Alan J Garber; Etie S Moghissi; Edwin D Bransome; Nathaniel G Clark; Stephen Clement; Rhoda H Cobin; Anthony P Furnary; Irl B Hirsch; Philip Levy; Robert Roberts; Greet Van den Berghe; Virginia Zamudio
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report.

Authors:  A K Jha; G J Kuperman; J M Teich; L Leape; B Shea; E Rittenberg; E Burdick; D L Seger; M Vander Vliet; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Early postoperative glucose control predicts nosocomial infection rate in diabetic patients.

Authors:  J J Pomposelli; J K Baxter; T J Babineau; E A Pomfret; D F Driscoll; R A Forse; B R Bistrian
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Implementing and evaluating a multicomponent inpatient diabetes management program: putting research into practice.

Authors:  Miguel Munoz; Peter Pronovost; Joanne Dintzis; Theresa Kemmerer; Nae-Yuh Wang; Yi-Ting Chang; Leigh Efird; Sean M Berenholtz; Sherita Hill Golden
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Basal-bolus insulin protocols enter the computer age.

Authors:  Nancy J Wei; Deborah J Wexler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Joshua Feblowitz; Seth Meltzer; Carmit McMullen; Ken Guappone; Jim Carpenter; Joshua Richardson; Linas Simonaitis; R Scott Evans; W Paul Nichol; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Modeling Inpatient Glucose Management Programs on Hospital Infection Control Programs: An Infrastructural Model of Excellence.

Authors:  Nestoras Mathioudakis; Peter J Pronovost; Sara E Cosgrove; Daniel Hager; Sherita Hill Golden
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2015-07

5.  The impact of electronic health record implementation and use on performance of the Surgical Care Improvement Project measures.

Authors:  Caroline Pinto Thirukumaran; James G Dolan; Patricia Reagan Webster; Robert J Panzer; Bruce Friedman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  A detailed description of the implementation of inpatient insulin orders with a commercial electronic health record system.

Authors:  Aaron Neinstein; Heidemarie Windham MacMaster; Mary M Sullivan; Robert Rushakoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-25

Review 7.  Design and implementation of a web-based reporting and benchmarking center for inpatient glucometrics.

Authors:  Greg Maynard; Jeffrey Lawrence Schnipper; Jordan Messler; Pedro Ramos; Kristen Kulasa; Ann Nolan; Kendall Rogers
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-12

Review 8.  The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes.

Authors:  Sherita Hill Golden; Nisa Maruthur; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Elias Spanakis; Daniel Rubin; Mihail Zilbermint; Felicia Hill-Briggs
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.