Literature DB >> 19885138

Overnight versus 24 hours of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion as supplement to oral antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes.

Tina Parkner1, Torben Laursen, Jian-Wen Chen, Marianne K Møller, Henrik F Thomsen, Christina Jørgensen, Jørgen S Smedegaard, Torsten Lauritzen, Jens S Christiansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Basal continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy at a fixed rate may effectively improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes when oral antidiabetic treatment fails. Regimens of simple constant subcutaneous delivery of insulin may provide theoretical advantages in type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: Ten subjects with type 2 diabetes who obtained insufficient glycemic control on oral antidiabetic drugs were included. Following an initial control day, two periods of 3 days with CSII of a rapid-acting insulin analogue, 1.5 IU/h (dose obtained from a preceding study), for 8 hours overnight and for 24 hours, respectively, were carried out in random order. Profiles of serum insulin aspart, serum endogenous insulin, and plasma glucose were recorded.
RESULTS: Compared to the control day, an 8-hour overnight insulin infusion during a 3-day period improved fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (mean differences +/- SEM; Delta59.0 +/- 10.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG) (Delta57.8 +/- 10.6 mg/dl; p < 0.01) after breakfast. Compared to an 8-hour overnight infusion, a 24-hour infusion further improved all three PPPG values after breakfast, lunch, and dinner (Delta28.8 +/- 8.1 mg/dl, Delta30.6 +/- 8.1 mg/dl, and Delta35.1 +/- 7.9 mg/dl; p < 0.01). During insulin infusion, only one hypoglycemic episode with PG <55.8 mg/dl and mild symptoms was recorded.
CONCLUSION: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with a rapid-acting insulin analogue at a fixed rate of 1.5 IU/h, either overnight or for 24 hours, improved glycemic control without safety concerns in patients with type 2 diabetes who had secondary failure to oral antidiabetic drugs. The effect on FPG was similar for both treatments, whereas the effect on PPPG was superior when insulin was infused during the entire 24 hours.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSII; insulin analogue; insulin aspart; insulin pump; intermittent insulin pump; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2007        PMID: 19885138      PMCID: PMC2769649          DOI: 10.1177/193229680700100514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  34 in total

1.  In vitro stability of insulin aspart in simulated continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using a MiniMed 508 insulin pump.

Authors:  J Senstius; E Harboe; H Westermann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Sulfonylurea inadequacy: efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57).

Authors:  Alex Wright; A C Felix Burden; Richard B Paisey; Carole A Cull; Rury R Holman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  M Shichiri; H Kishikawa; Y Ohkubo; N Wake
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Comparison of insulin glargine and NPH insulin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a review of clinical studies.

Authors:  William Duckworth; Stephen N Davis
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.852

5.  The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Matthew C Riddle; Julio Rosenstock; John Gerich
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Enzyme immunoassay for intact human insulin in serum or plasma.

Authors:  L Andersen; B Dinesen; P N Jørgensen; F Poulsen; M E Røder
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Albumin-bound basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and NN344): comparable time-action profiles but less variability than insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  O Klein; J Lynge; L Endahl; B Damholt; L Nosek; T Heise
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 8.  Assessing the potential for alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in prediabetic states.

Authors:  R R Holman
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  The effect of insulin treatment on insulin secretion and insulin action in type II diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  W T Garvey; J M Olefsky; J Griffin; R F Hamman; O G Kolterman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Leszek Nosek; Birgitte Biilmann Rønn; Lars Endahl; Lutz Heinemann; Christoph Kapitza; Eberhard Draeger
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.