Literature DB >> 19884741

Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a study from North India.

V Gupta1, P Datta, H Rani, J Chander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The resistance to antimicrobial agents among Staphylococci is an increasing problem. The resistance to macrolide can be mediated by msr A gene coding for efflux mechanism or via erm gene encoding for enzymes that confer inducible or constitutive resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and Type B streptogramin. AIM: The present study was aimed to find out the percentage of Staphylococcus aureus having inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLS(B)) in our geographic area using D-test. Also, we tried to ascertain the relationship between Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and inducible clindamycin resistance, association of these iMLS(B) isolates with community or nosocomial setting and treatment options for these iMLS(B) isolates. SETTINGS AND
DESIGN: A total of 200 non-duplicate Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various clinical samples from both outdoor and indoor patients were studied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Susceptibility to routine antimicrobial agents was carried out using Kirby Bauer method. Methicillin resistance was detected by oxacillin disc on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) supplemented with 2% NaCl. D-test was performed on all erythromycin-resistant and clindamycin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains to detect inducible clindamycin resistance.
RESULTS: Among 200 Staphylococcus aureus strains, 50 (25%) were found to be MRSA and 36 were D-test positive. Also, MRSA isolates showed both higher inducible resistance and constitutive resistance to clindamycin as compared to Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Out of 36 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus showing inducible clindamycin resistance, 24 were from the outpatient department and 12 were recovered from indoor patients. All isolates of Staphylococcus aureus showed 100% sensitivity to vancomycin and linezolid.
CONCLUSIONS: Clindamycin is kept as a reserve drug and is usually advocated in severe MRSA infections depending upon the antimicrobial susceptibility results. We have reported a higher incidence of iMLS(B) from both community (66.67%) as well as hospital (33.33%) setup. Therefore clinical microbiology laboratory should report inducible clindamycin resistance routinely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19884741     DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.57393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0022-3859            Impact factor:   1.476


  12 in total

1.  Inducible Clindamycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Sub Himalayan Region of India.

Authors:  Kiran K Mokta; Santwana Verma; Divya Chauhan; Sunite A Ganju; Digvijay Singh; Anil Kanga; Anita Kumari; Vinod Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

2.  Detection of tetracycline and macrolide resistance determinants in Enterococci of animal and environmental origin using multiplex PCR.

Authors:  A Brtková; M Revallová; Helena Bujdáková
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome: mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Jonathan A Silversides; Emma Lappin; Andrew J Ferguson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Inducible clindamycin resistance and nasal carriage rates of Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers and community members.

Authors:  Alaa M Mahmoud; Hanaa S Albadawy; Samira M Bolis; Naser E Bilal; Abdalla O Ahmed; Mutasim E Ibrahim
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Prevalence of MLSB Resistance and Observation of erm A & erm C Genes At A Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Ameer Abbas; Preeti Srivastava; Prem Singh Nirwan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  New update on molecular diversity of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Iran: antimicrobial resistance, adhesion and virulence factors, biofilm formation and SCCmec typing.

Authors:  Mahtab Tabandeh; Hami Kaboosi; Mojtaba Taghizadeh Armaki; Abazar Pournajaf; Fatemeh Peyravii Ghadikolaii
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Clinical Samples.

Authors:  Kavitha Prabhu; Sunil Rao; Venkatakrishna Rao
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2011-01

8.  Inducible clindamycin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to erm genes, Iran.

Authors:  Mojtaba Moosavian; Saeed Shoja; Soodabeh Rostami; Maryam Torabipour; Zahra Farshadzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2014-12

9.  Incidence of constitutive and inducible clindamycin resistance among hospital-associated Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B Sasirekha; M S Usha; J A Amruta; S Ankit; N Brinda; R Divya
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Prevalence of Mupirocin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Among Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Parul Chaturvedi; Amit Kumar Singh; Amit Kumar Singh; Snehanshu Shukla; Loveleena Agarwal
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.