Literature DB >> 19884439

Comparison of two intraoperative assessment methods for injuries to the ankle syndesmosis. A cadaveric study.

Karl Stoffel1, David Wysocki, Edward Baddour, Rochelle Nicholls, Piers Yates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative stress testing is required for the detection of syndesmosis instability following an ankle fracture. The present study compared two stress tests for the detection of syndesmotic injury.
METHODS: A true mortise radiograph of the ankle was made for fourteen cadaver joints. Specimens were randomized into two groups to simulate ligament and syndesmosis injury on the basis of the Danis-Weber classification system. In the first group, the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament was divided first (Weber B(r)), followed sequentially by division of the interosseous membrane (Weber C) and the deltoid ligament. In the second group, the deltoid ligament was divided first, followed by the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament. Radiographs were made at each stage with use of two methods of stressing the ankle mortise: (1) external rotation of the foot with an external moment of 7.5 Nm, and (2) application of a lateral force of 100 N. Tibiofibular overlap, tibiofibular clear space, and medial clear space were measured.
RESULTS: Lateral stress produced a significantly greater increase in the tibiofibular clear space than did the external rotation test for Weber C injuries and Weber C plus deltoid ligament injuries. A greater increase in the tibiofibular clear space was noted during the lateral stress test when both the deltoid and the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament had been sectioned (p < 0.05). The external rotation stress test produced a significant increase in the medial clear space in the presence of isolated anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament and deltoid ligament injuries (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: For the detection of syndesmotic instability at the site of ankle fractures on stress radiographs, the lateral stress test appeared to be superior to the external rotation stress test in this cadaver model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19884439     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  26 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of individual ankle syndesmosis structures in asymptomatic and surgically treated cohorts.

Authors:  Thomas O Clanton; Charles P Ho; Brady T Williams; Rachel K Surowiec; Coley C Gatlin; C Thomas Haytmanek; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Surgical treatment of syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screw on ankle function.

Authors:  Yi-Ton Hsu; Chi-Chuan Wu; Wei-Cheun Lee; Kuo-Feng Fan; I-Chuan Tseng; Po-Cheng Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Maxwell W Weinberg; Nathan P Davidson; Megan K Mills; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Diagnosing syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-07-18

7.  Management of chronic disruption of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  Wataru Miyamoto; Masato Takao
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-01-18

8.  In Vivo Syndesmotic Overcompression After Fixation of Ankle Fractures With a Syndesmotic Injury.

Authors:  Steven M Cherney; Jacob A Haynes; Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes; Christopher M McAndrew; William M Ricci; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Radiographic evaluation of the ankle syndesmosis.

Authors:  Stephen Croft; Andrew Furey; Craig Stone; Carl Moores; Robert Wilson
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Arthroscopically Assisted Open Reduction-Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: Significance of the Arthroscopic Ankle Drive-through Sign.

Authors:  William W Schairer; Benedict U Nwachukwu; David M Dare; Mark C Drakos
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.