OBJECTIVE: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies are a serological marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); up to 10%-15% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are also positive. While anti-CCP in RA is citrulline-dependent, anti-CCP in some other diseases is citrulline-independent and reacts with both CCP and the unmodified (arginine-containing) cyclic arginine peptide (CAP). We investigated the citrulline dependence of anti-CCP and its significance in the arthritis of SLE. METHODS: IgG anti-CCP was compared by ELISA to anti-CAP in sera from patients with SLE (n = 335) and RA (n = 47) and healthy controls (n = 35). SLE patients were divided into 5 groups based on their joint involvement: subset I: deforming/erosive arthritis (n = 20); II: arthritis fulfilling (or likely fulfilling) American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA but without erosions (n = 18); III: joint swelling but not fulfilling RA criteria (n = 39); IV: arthritis without documented joint swelling (n = 194); and V: no arthritis (n = 58). RESULTS: Anti-CCP (> 1.7 units) was found in 68% (32/47) of patients with RA and 17% (55/329) of those with SLE. It was more common in SLE patients with deforming/erosive arthritis (38%). High anti-CCP (> 10 units) was found in RA (26%) and deforming/erosive SLE (12%). High anti-CCP/CAP ratios (> 2, indicating a selectivity to CCP) were found in 91% of anti-CCP-positive RA and 50% of anti-CCP-positive SLE patients with deforming/erosive arthritis. Patients from subset II did not have high anti-CCP/CAP. CONCLUSION: Citrulline dependence or high levels (> 10) of anti-CCP were common in SLE patients with deforming/erosive arthritis, while most anti-CCP in SLE patients was citrulline-independent. This may be useful in identifying a subset of SLE patients with high risk for development of deforming/erosive arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies are a serological marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); up to 10%-15% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are also positive. While anti-CCP in RA is citrulline-dependent, anti-CCP in some other diseases is citrulline-independent and reacts with both CCP and the unmodified (arginine-containing) cyclic arginine peptide (CAP). We investigated the citrulline dependence of anti-CCP and its significance in the arthritis of SLE. METHODS: IgG anti-CCP was compared by ELISA to anti-CAP in sera from patients with SLE (n = 335) and RA (n = 47) and healthy controls (n = 35). SLEpatients were divided into 5 groups based on their joint involvement: subset I: deforming/erosive arthritis (n = 20); II: arthritis fulfilling (or likely fulfilling) American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA but without erosions (n = 18); III: joint swelling but not fulfilling RA criteria (n = 39); IV: arthritis without documented joint swelling (n = 194); and V: no arthritis (n = 58). RESULTS: Anti-CCP (> 1.7 units) was found in 68% (32/47) of patients with RA and 17% (55/329) of those with SLE. It was more common in SLEpatients with deforming/erosive arthritis (38%). High anti-CCP (> 10 units) was found in RA (26%) and deforming/erosive SLE (12%). High anti-CCP/CAP ratios (> 2, indicating a selectivity to CCP) were found in 91% of anti-CCP-positive RA and 50% of anti-CCP-positive SLEpatients with deforming/erosive arthritis. Patients from subset II did not have high anti-CCP/CAP. CONCLUSION:Citrulline dependence or high levels (> 10) of anti-CCP were common in SLEpatients with deforming/erosive arthritis, while most anti-CCP in SLEpatients was citrulline-independent. This may be useful in identifying a subset of SLEpatients with high risk for development of deforming/erosive arthritis.
Authors: D Makrygiannakis; E af Klint; I E Lundberg; R Löfberg; A-K Ulfgren; L Klareskog; A I Catrina Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: G A Schellekens; B A de Jong; F H van den Hoogen; L B van de Putte; W J van Venrooij Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-01-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M Satoh; H Yamagata; F Watanabe; Y Matsushita; K Sakamoto; K Yoshida; S Nakayama; M Akizuki Journal: Scand J Rheumatol Date: 1993 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: D Alarcón-Segovia; C Abud-Mendoza; E Diaz-Jouanen; A Iglesias; V De los Reyes; J Hernández-Ortiz Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1988-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Rodolfo Perez-Alamino; Ignacio Garcia-Valladares; Raquel Cuchacovich; Antonio Iglesias-Gamarra; Luis R Espinoza Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 2.631