Literature DB >> 19883931

Blue-blocking IOLs decrease photoreception without providing significant photoprotection.

Martin A Mainster1, Patricia L Turner.   

Abstract

Violet and blue light are responsible for 45% of scotopic, 67% of melanopsin, 83% of human circadian (melatonin suppression) and 94% of S-cone photoreception in pseudophakic eyes (isoilluminance source). Yellow chromophores in blue-blocking intraocular lenses (IOLs) eliminate between 43 and 57% of violet and blue light between 400 and 500 nm, depending on their dioptric power. This restriction adversely affects pseudophakic photopic luminance contrast, photopic S-cone foveal threshold, mesopic contrast acuity, scotopic short-wavelength sensitivity and circadian photoreception. Yellow IOL chromophores provide no tangible clinical benefits in exchange for the photoreception losses they cause. They fail to decrease disability glare or improve contrast sensitivity. Most epidemiological evidence shows that environmental light exposure and cataract surgery are not significant risk factors for the progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Thus, the use of blue-blocking IOLs is not evidence-based medicine. Most AMD occurs in phakic adults over 60 years of age, despite crystalline lens photoprotection far greater than that of blue-blocking IOLs. Therefore, if light does play some role in the pathogenesis of AMD, then 1) senescent crystalline lenses do not prevent it, so neither can blue-blocking IOLs that offer far less photoprotection, and 2) all pseudophakes should wear sunglasses in bright environments. Pseudophakes have the freedom to remove their sunglasses for optimal photoreception whenever they choose to do so, provided that they are not encumbered permanently by yellow IOL chromophores. In essence, yellow chromophores are placebos for prevention of AMD that permanently restrict a pseudophake's dim light and circadian photoreception at ages when they are needed most. If yellow IOLs had been the standard of care, then colorless UV-blocking IOLs could be advocated now as "premium" IOLs because they offer dim light and circadian photoreception roughly 15-20 years more youthful than blue-blocking IOLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19883931     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  29 in total

Review 1.  Retinal light toxicity.

Authors:  P N Youssef; N Sheibani; D M Albert
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Blue light's benefits vs blue-blocking intraocular lens chromophores.

Authors:  Martin A Mainster; Patricia L Turner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Blue light-filtering intraocular lenses and post-operative mood: a pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Stephanie Leruez; Cedric Annweiler; Benedicte Gohier; Olivier Beauchet; Jean-Marc Ebran; Philippe Gohier; Dan Milea
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Blue-blocking intraocular implants should be used routinely during phacoemulsification surgery--yes.

Authors:  R J Symes; F M Cuthbertson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Are melanopsin cells blocked by filtering IOLs?

Authors:  Simon R Bababeygy; Alfredo A Sadun
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Estimation of the melatonin suppression index through clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Ichiya Sano; Masaki Tanito; Tsutomu Okuno; Yoshihisa Ishiba; Akihiro Ohira
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Clinical comparative analysis of the outcomes with a yellow- and a violet-tinted intraocular lens.

Authors:  Peter Mojzis; Zdenek Bombera; Sarka Vesela; Daniela Klapuchova; Peter Ziak; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Effect of blue light-filtering intraocular lens on color vision in patients with macular diseases after vitrectomy.

Authors:  Kumiko Mokuno; Tetsu Asami; Norie Nonobe; Hirotaka Ito; Kumi Fujiwara; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Ultraviolet or blue-filtering intraocular lenses: what is the evidence?

Authors:  S M Downes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Histologic basis of variations in retinal pigment epithelium autofluorescence in eyes with geographic atrophy.

Authors:  Martin Rudolf; Susan D Vogt; Christine A Curcio; Carrie Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Anna Wagner; Salvatore Grisanti; Russell W Read
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.