Literature DB >> 19883608

A simple and highly sensitive method for magnetic nanoparticle quantitation using 1H-NMR spectroscopy.

Jonathan Gunn1, Rajan K Paranji, Miqin Zhang.   

Abstract

Iron oxide superparamagnetic nanoparticles (SPIONs) have drawn significant attention because of their potential impact on medical diagnosis and therapy. However, the difficulty of achieving reliable and standardized quantification of these nanoparticles has limited the uniform study of nanoparticle systems. Current measurement techniques have limited sensitivity, and are sophisticated and subject to individual instrumental settings. Here, a characterization method using proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H-NMR) spectroscopy is presented that can quantify SPIONs regardless of surface modification. In addition to routine quantification of SPIONs during nanoparticle development, the method can also be used with in vitro nanoparticle assays and potentially with tissue samples for biodistribution studies. Specifically, measurement of water relaxivity shifts (R(1) or R(2)) of dissolved SPION samples is correlated with nanoparticle concentration. Unmodified and dextran- and poly(ethylene glycol)-coated SPIONs gave linear correlations between SPION concentration and R(1) and R(2) relaxivities over five orders of magnitude, to below 10 ppb iron. Quantification of SPION concentration was also demonstrated in the presence of RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. A linear correlation between the SPION concentration and relaxivities was observed to <10 ng Fe/mL. This method is a rapid and inexpensive approach for quantitation of SPIONs and exhibits a number of advantages over many of the current methods for quantitative SPION analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19883608      PMCID: PMC2770602          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  25 in total

1.  Neurotransplantation of magnetically labeled oligodendrocyte progenitors: magnetic resonance tracking of cell migration and myelination.

Authors:  J W Bulte; S Zhang; P van Gelderen; V Herynek; E K Jordan; I D Duncan; J A Frank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Non-invasive detection of apoptosis using magnetic resonance imaging and a targeted contrast agent.

Authors:  M Zhao; D A Beauregard; L Loizou; B Davletov; K M Brindle
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Potential bias in NMR relaxation data introduced by peak intensity analysis and curve fitting methods.

Authors:  J H Viles; B M Duggan; E Zaborowski; S Schwarzinger; J J Huntley; G J Kroon; H J Dyson; P E Wright
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Four complementary theoretical approaches for the analysis of NMR paramagnetic relaxation.

Authors:  Nathaniel Schaefle; Robert Sharp
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Development of tumor targeting bioprobes ((111)In-chimeric L6 monoclonal antibody nanoparticles) for alternating magnetic field cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sally J DeNardo; Gerald L DeNardo; Laird A Miers; Arutselvan Natarajan; Alan R Foreman; Cordula Gruettner; Grete N Adamson; Robert Ivkov
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Expression of transferrin receptor and ferritin following ferumoxides-protamine sulfate labeling of cells: implications for cellular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Edyta Pawelczyk; Ali S Arbab; Sunil Pandit; Elbert Hu; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Optical and MRI multifunctional nanoprobe for targeting gliomas.

Authors:  Omid Veiseh; Conroy Sun; Jonathan Gunn; Nathan Kohler; Patrik Gabikian; Donghoon Lee; Narayan Bhattarai; Richard Ellenbogen; Raymond Sze; Andrew Hallahan; Jim Olson; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Efficient magnetic cell labeling with protamine sulfate complexed to ferumoxides for cellular MRI.

Authors:  Ali S Arbab; Gene T Yocum; Heather Kalish; Elaine K Jordan; Stasia A Anderson; Aarif Y Khakoo; Elizabeth J Read; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Inhibition of tumor-cell invasion with chlorotoxin-bound superparamagnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Omid Veiseh; Jonathan W Gunn; Forrest M Kievit; Conroy Sun; Chen Fang; Jerry S H Lee; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 13.281

10.  A bifunctional poly(ethylene glycol) silane immobilized on metallic oxide-based nanoparticles for conjugation with cell targeting agents.

Authors:  Nathan Kohler; Glen E Fryxell; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Optical Microscopy Systems for the Detection of Unlabeled Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ralf P Friedrich; Mona Kappes; Iwona Cicha; Rainer Tietze; Christian Braun; Regine Schneider-Stock; Roland Nagy; Christoph Alexiou; Christina Janko
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Quantitative [Fe]MRI of PSMA-targeted SPIONs specifically discriminates among prostate tumor cell types based on their PSMA expression levels.

Authors:  Laurel O Sillerud
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-01-20

3.  Intracellular Quantification and Localization of Label-Free Iron Oxide Nanoparticles by Holotomographic Microscopy.

Authors:  Ralf P Friedrich; Eveline Schreiber; Rainer Tietze; Hai Yang; Christian Pilarsky; Christoph Alexiou
Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl       Date:  2020-12-09

4.  Comparison of Confocal and Super-Resolution Reflectance Imaging of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Emily J Guggenheim; Abdullah Khan; Jeremy Pike; Lynne Chang; Iseult Lynch; Joshua Z Rappoport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.