Literature DB >> 19882754

Gasless laparoscopy for benign gynecological diseases using an abdominal wall-lifting system.

Yue Wang1, Heng Cui, Yan Zhao, Zhi-qi Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The use of gasless laparoscopy with an abdominal wall-lifting device for benign gynecological diseases was compared to conventional laparoscopy with CO(2) pneumoperitoneum.
METHODS: From February 2007 to July 2007, 76 women with uterine and/or adnexal benign diseases and candidates for laparoscopic surgery were recruited in this study. Thirty-two women underwent gasless laparoscopic surgery and 44 women underwent pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery.
RESULTS: Diverse pathologies, including adnexal cyst, uterine myoma and ectopic pregnancy, were treated successfully with gasless laparoscopic surgery. Compared with the patients in the pneumoperitoneum group, the similar hospital stay (P=0.353) and intraoperative blood loss (P=0.157) were observed. However, the mean operative time in the gasless group was significantly longer than that in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.003). No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications were found in either group, except for one case of laparotomic conversion in the pneumoperitoneum group due to dense pelvic adhesions. The total hospital charges were significantly less in the gasless group than in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.001). In 38 cases of ovarian cyst resection, the mean operative time in the gasless group remained longer than that in the pneumoperitoneum group (P=0.017). The total hospital charges were also significantly less in the gasless group than in the pneumoperitoneum group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrated that the laparoscopic procedure using the gasless technique was a safe, effective method to treat benign gynecological diseases. Moreover, it was easy to master. As a minimally invasive treatment, gasless laparoscopic surgery provides a good choice to patients in the undeveloped regions in China without increasing the patients' and the government's burden significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19882754      PMCID: PMC2772884          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B0820122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  28 in total

1.  Gasless versus conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  J C Lukban; J Jaeger; K C Hammond; D A LoBraico; A M Gordon; R A Graebe
Journal:  N J Med       Date:  2000-05

2.  Tissue-puncher and loop-ligation--new aids for surgical-therapeutic pelviscopy (laparoscopy) = endoscopic intraabdominal surgery.

Authors:  K Semm
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Laparoscopic adnexectomy for benign tubo-ovarian disease using abdominal wall lift: a comparison to laparotomy.

Authors:  H Tintara; T Choobun
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 4.  Isobaric (gasless) laparoscopic uterine myomectomy. An overview.

Authors:  Francesco Sesti; Luigi Melgrati; Alfredo Damiani; Emilio Piccione
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Lift-(gasless) laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel Kruschinski; Shirli Homburg
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2005

6.  Simplified abdominal wall-lifting device for gasless laparoscopy.

Authors:  H Tintara; R Leetanaporn; C Getpook; T Suntharasaj
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Fishing-rod-type abdominal wall lifter for gasless laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H Nakamura; Y Kobori; N Goseki; H Inoue; K Takeshita; M Endo; T Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Gasless laparoscopy--useless or useful?

Authors:  D J Hill; P J Maher; E C Wood
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1994-05

9.  Randomized comparison of conventional and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative technique, postoperative course, and recovery.

Authors:  J F Larsen; P Ejstrud; J U Kristensen; F Svendsen; F Redke; V Pedersen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Gasless laparoscopic myomectomy. Indications, surgical technique and advantages of a new procedure for removing uterine leiomyomas.

Authors:  Alfredo Damiani; Luigi Melgrati; Massimiliano Marziali; Francesco Sesti
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of gasless laparoscopy on circulation, respiration, stress response, and other complications in gynecological geriatrics.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Li; Juan Deng; Fa-Tian Huang; Xiao-We Gan; Yun-Gui Cao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

2.  Abdominal wall-lifting versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopy: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Ren; Yao Tong; Xi-Bing Ding; Xin Wang; Shu-Qing Jin; Xiao-Yin Niu; Xiang Zhao; Quan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-06-15

3.  Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Haitham Shoman; Simone Sandler; Alexander Peters; Ameer Farooq; Magdalen Gruendl; Shauna Trinh; James Little; Alex Woods; William Bolton; Abubakar Abioye; David Ljungman
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 4.  Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Aruparayil; W Bolton; A Mishra; L Bains; J Gnanaraj; R King; T Ensor; N King; D Jayne; B Shinkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.