Literature DB >> 19882080

Platelet monitoring for PCI: is it really necessary?

U S Tantry1, P A Gurbel.   

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly improved clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease patients. Since PCI is associated with platelet activation, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors comprise the cornerstone strategy during and following PCI. The latter agents are arguably the most important drugs we administer to the patient with established coronary artery disease since they are specifically given to prevent the most catastrophic event, the formation of an occlusive arterial thrombus. Numerous clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in attenuating recurrent ischaemic event occurrence. Despite the extensive use of antiplatelet therapies, ischaemic event occurrence such as post-procedural myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis still remains an important concern and highlights the need for improved treatment strategies. A major limitation of current treatment is the application of a "one size fits all" strategy advocated by the guidelines that completely ignores the evaluation of the individual antiplatelet response. Pharmacodynamic studies have revealed the limitations of aspirin and clopidogrel treatment that include response variability, and a high prevalence of antiplatelet non-responsiveness associated with significant risk for recurrent ischemic event occurrence. Thus, two major paradoxes in cardiovascular medicine today are: 1) despite the overwhelming evidence that platelet reactivity strongly influences the development of potentially catastrophic events including myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis in the PCI patient, no measurement is made in clinical practice to assess the presence of blood vulnerability (platelet reactivity) and 2) despite the overwhelming evidence that the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 receptor blockers is variable, the guidelines largely recommend a uniform, "one size fits all" dosing of these agents in the PCI patient without any confirmation of an adequate antiplatelet effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19882080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hamostaseologie        ISSN: 0720-9355            Impact factor:   1.778


  2 in total

1.  Impact of platelet function test on platelet responsiveness and clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation: platelet responsiveness and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Long Hao Yu; Moo Hyun Kim; Hong Zhe Zhang; Jong Seong Park; Tae Ho Park; Young Dae Kim; Kwang Soo Cha; Jin Yeong Han
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.243

2.  Prognostic value of mean platelet volume in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mir Hossein Seyyed-Mohammadzad; Ramin Eskandari; Yousef Rezaei; Kamal Khademvatani; Maryam Mehrpooya; Alireza Rostamzadeh; Afshin Zahedi
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.596

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.