OBJECTIVE: Variants of two genes, CYP2C9 and VKORC1, explain approximately one third of variability in warfarin maintenance dose requirements. However, the clinical utility of using this information in addition to clinical and demographic data ('pharmacogenomic-guidance') is unclear, as few comparative clinical trials have been conducted to date. The objective of this study was to explore the incremental effect of pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing under various conditions using clinical trial simulation. METHODS: We used an existing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to perform clinical trial simulations of pharmacogenomic-guided versus standard of care warfarin therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of patient time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy. We assessed the influence of the frequency of INR monitoring, and the use of a loading dose and dose increase delay in patients with CYP2C9 variants. RESULTS: Pharmacogenomic guidance resulted in a 3-4 percentage point absolute increase in time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy compared with standard of care. The improvement in time in range was greater when the frequency of INR monitoring in both arms was assumed to be lower. The absolute difference increased to 6-8 percentage points with the use of a loading dose and dose increase delay in patients with a CYP2C9 variant. CONCLUSION: Our initial results imply that pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing may be more useful in settings with less intensive patient follow-up, and when adjustments are made for slower therapeutic response in patients with a CYP2C9 variant. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model development may be useful for warfarin pharmacogenomic trial design.
OBJECTIVE: Variants of two genes, CYP2C9 and VKORC1, explain approximately one third of variability in warfarin maintenance dose requirements. However, the clinical utility of using this information in addition to clinical and demographic data ('pharmacogenomic-guidance') is unclear, as few comparative clinical trials have been conducted to date. The objective of this study was to explore the incremental effect of pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing under various conditions using clinical trial simulation. METHODS: We used an existing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to perform clinical trial simulations of pharmacogenomic-guided versus standard of care warfarin therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of patient time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy. We assessed the influence of the frequency of INR monitoring, and the use of a loading dose and dose increase delay in patients with CYP2C9 variants. RESULTS: Pharmacogenomic guidance resulted in a 3-4 percentage point absolute increase in time spent in therapeutic range over the first month of therapy compared with standard of care. The improvement in time in range was greater when the frequency of INR monitoring in both arms was assumed to be lower. The absolute difference increased to 6-8 percentage points with the use of a loading dose and dose increase delay in patients with a CYP2C9 variant. CONCLUSION: Our initial results imply that pharmacogenomic-guided warfarin dosing may be more useful in settings with less intensive patient follow-up, and when adjustments are made for slower therapeutic response in patients with a CYP2C9 variant. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model development may be useful for warfarin pharmacogenomic trial design.
Authors: Marieke Torn; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Ward L E M Bollen; Felix J M van der Meer; Ernst E van der Wall; Frits R Rosendaal Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-07-13
Authors: Jeffrey L Anderson; Benjamin D Horne; Scott M Stevens; Amanda S Grove; Stephanie Barton; Zachery P Nicholas; Samera F S Kahn; Heidi T May; Kent M Samuelson; Joseph B Muhlestein; John F Carlquist Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B F Gage; C Eby; J A Johnson; E Deych; M J Rieder; P M Ridker; P E Milligan; G Grice; P Lenzini; A E Rettie; C L Aquilante; L Grosso; S Marsh; T Langaee; L E Farnett; D Voora; D L Veenstra; R J Glynn; A Barrett; H L McLeod Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Mahesh N Samtani; Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo; Kathryn H Brown; Dirk Cerneus; Christopher J Molloy Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Todd S Perlstein; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Kerrie Nelson; Victoria Joshi; T Vance Morgan; Lawrence J Lesko; Joo-Yeon Lee; Jogarao Gobburu; David Schoenfeld; Raju Kucherlapati; Mason W Freeman; Mark A Creager Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Vincent A Fusaro; Prasad Patil; Chih-Lin Chi; Charles F Contant; Peter J Tonellato Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 29.690