Literature DB >> 1988138

Carcinogen-induced lymphomagenesis in pim-1 transgenic mice: dose dependence and involvement of myc and ras.

M Breuer1, E Wientjens, S Verbeek, R Slebos, A Berns.   

Abstract

Transgenic mice overexpressing the pim-1 oncogene in their lymphoid compartments are predisposed to T-cell lymphomagenesis but only to the extent that approximately 10% of the transgenic mice develop lymphomas within 34 weeks after birth. Recently, we have shown that lymphomagenesis in pim-1 transgenic mice can be accelerated by infecting pim-1 transgenic mice with murine leukemia viruses or by treating the mice with a relatively low dose of 60 mg of the carcinogen N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) per kg of body weight. Here we describe the incidence of tumors as a function of the dose of ENU. Either 200, 15, 4, 1, or 0.1 mg/kg ENU was injected into transgenic and control mice and the tumor incidence was monitored. T-cell lymphomas developed in 100 and 70% of the pim-1 transgenic mice treated with 200 and 15 mg/kg ENU, respectively. Approximately 20% of the Emu-pim-1 transgenic mice developed lymphomas after treatment with either 4, 1, or 0.1 mg/kg ENU. The nontransgenic mice developed lymphomas only after injection with 200 mg/kg (45%). The data show that Emu-pim-1 transgenic mice are approximately 25-fold more susceptible to ENU-induced lymphomagenesis than control mice. In most tumors the expression of c-myc was strongly elevated, probably as a direct or indirect effect of ENU. Analysis of the lymphomas for ras mutations revealed that approximately 10% of the lymphomas bear a ras mutation. The data indicate that at least some of these mutations are not the direct result of alkylation by ENU but rather represent spontaneous mutations that occurred later in the tumorigenic process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1988138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  11 in total

1.  Persistence of leukemia-initiating cells in a conditional knockin model of an imatinib-responsive myeloproliferative disorder.

Authors:  Katherine I Oravecz-Wilson; Steven T Philips; Omer H Yilmaz; Heather M Ames; Lina Li; Brendan D Crawford; Alice M Gauvin; Peter C Lucas; Kajal Sitwala; James R Downing; Sean J Morrison; Theodora S Ross
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  PIM1 induces cellular senescence through phosphorylation of UHRF1 at Ser311.

Authors:  J Yang; K Liu; J Yang; B Jin; H Chen; X Zhan; Z Li; L Wang; X Shen; M Li; W Yu; Z Mao
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  AML1-ETO expression is directly involved in the development of acute myeloid leukemia in the presence of additional mutations.

Authors:  Y Yuan; L Zhou; T Miyamoto; H Iwasaki; N Harakawa; C J Hetherington; S A Burel; E Lagasse; I L Weissman; K Akashi; D E Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A small molecule inhibitor of Pim protein kinases blocks the growth of precursor T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma.

Authors:  Ying-Wei Lin; Zanna M Beharry; Elizabeth G Hill; Jin H Song; Wenxue Wang; Zuping Xia; Zhenhua Zhang; Peter D Aplan; Jon C Aster; Charles D Smith; Andrew S Kraft
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  In vivo analysis of Pim-1 deficiency.

Authors:  P W Laird; N M van der Lugt; A Clarke; J Domen; K Linders; J McWhir; A Berns; M Hooper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Hypoxia-mediated up-regulation of Pim-1 contributes to solid tumor formation.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Masanobu Kobayashi; Stephanie Darmanin; Yi Qiao; Christopher Gully; Ruiying Zhao; Satoshi Kondo; Hua Wang; Huamin Wang; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung; Mong-Hong Lee
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Pim kinases phosphorylate multiple sites on Bad and promote 14-3-3 binding and dissociation from Bcl-XL.

Authors:  Andrew Macdonald; David G Campbell; Rachel Toth; Hilary McLauchlan; C James Hastie; J Simon C Arthur
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Testing electromagnetic fields for potential carcinogenic activity: a critical review of animal models.

Authors:  J McCann; R Kavet; C N Rafferty
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Assessing the potential carcinogenic activity of magnetic fields using animal models.

Authors:  J McCann; R Kavet; C N Rafferty
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Genetic Modeling of PIM Proteins in Cancer: Proviral Tagging and Cooperation with Oncogenes, Tumor Suppressor Genes, and Carcinogens.

Authors:  Enara Aguirre; Oliver Renner; Maja Narlik-Grassow; Carmen Blanco-Aparicio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.