Literature DB >> 19881103

Evaluation of breast calcifications.

Yojana V Nalawade1.   

Abstract

Various patterns of calcifications occur in the breast; some benign, some malignant. A knowledge of these patterns on mammography helps in accurate interpretation and management.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19881103      PMCID: PMC2797739          DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.57208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging        ISSN: 0970-2016


Introduction

Microcalcifications can be the early and only presenting sign of breast cancer. Mammography is used worldwide to detect microcalcifications. Hence, with the help of mammography, we can not only diagnose cancer in a nonpalpable stage but can also detect the extent of the disease. It is very essential to perform a proper evaluation of various calcifications to decide whether they are benign or malignant. A biopsy can be avoided if the calcifications appear absolutely benign on mammography and the patient can be followed-up with annual screening mammography. In 1913, a German surgeon, Solomon, reported the presence of microcalcifications in the radiographic examination of a mastectomy specimen. In 1949, Leborgne, a radiologist, postulated that the presence of microcalcifications may be the only mammographic manifestation of a carcinoma.[1] Since then, all radiologists have made active efforts to look for microcalcifications in mammograms and this in turn over the years has resulted in a significant improvement in the resolution and performance of the mammography machines. To detect microcalcifications efficiently, a good mammography machine should have: dedicated mammography grids, a small focal spot and a proper source image distance In addition, the following are necessary: Magnification. Every area of microcalcifications should be magnified. Proper processing of the mammography films should be performed, with longer processing times as compared to conventional radiography. The use of a magnifying glass, which helps in better visualization, is a must. A dedicated mammography viewing box (more than 3000 nit) should be used. There should be very little (<50 lux) ambient light in the room. A computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) system is useful when evaluating a large volume of examinations, although CAD systems may sometimes fail to pick up amorphous calcifications.[2] Full-field digital mammography machines are better than film-screen mammography machines for diagnosing microcalcifications. High-resolution computer radiography (CR) machines cannot detect microcalcifications efficiently.[3] Once calcifications are detected, they have to be described and categorized according to the lexicon mentioned in BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System) so that the radiologist, the surgeon and the pathologist share a common language. BI-RADS, developed by the American college of Radiology, is followed worldwide to describe and categorize breast abnormalities. In the chapter titled ‘Lexicons’ in the official BI-RADS publication, calcifications are described according to their appearance and distribution.

According to appearance

Calcifications that are typically benign are described as follows:[5]

Eggshell or rim-like calcifications:

These are thin, round, rim-like calcifications often seen in the walls of cysts or in fat necrosis [Figure 1].
Figure 1

Mammogram shows rim/egg-shell calcification (arrow)

Mammogram shows rim/egg-shell calcification (arrow)

Coarse and popcorn-like calcifications:

These are calcifications seen within degenerating fibroadenomas [Figure 2A and B].
Figure 2 (A,B):

Mammograms show degenerating fibroadenomas with coarse (arrow in A) and popcorn (arrow in B) calcification

Mammograms show degenerating fibroadenomas with coarse (arrow in A) and popcorn (arrow in B) calcification

Vascular calcifications:

These are also described as railroad track calcifications, showing a linear configuration, either singly or in parallel pairs [Figure 3]. When small, single and linear, these calcifications should be differentiated from malignant calcifications.
Figure 3

Mammogram shows linear, railroad track calcification (arrows), consistent with vascular calcification

Mammogram shows linear, railroad track calcification (arrows), consistent with vascular calcification

Large, rod-like calcifications or secretory deposits:

These are due to secretory disease. The calcific foci are thick and follow the ducts, toward the nipple [Figure 4].
Figure 4

Mammogram shows thick, large, rod-like calcific foci (arrows) due to secretory disease

Mammogram shows thick, large, rod-like calcific foci (arrows) due to secretory disease

Milk of calcium:

These are seen as tiny, teacup-shaped calcifications, situated within small cysts on the lateral view [Figure 5]. Sometimes, the small, rounded soft-tissue shadow of the cyst itself is also appreciated.
Figure 5

Lateral mammogram shows milk of calcium with layering (arrow)

Lateral mammogram shows milk of calcium with layering (arrow)

Lucent-centered calcifications:

These are rounded calcifications with a lucent center usually representing dermal calcifications [Figure 6A]. Larger calcifications with lucent centers may be due to oil cysts/fat necrosis and may follow surgery or trauma [Figure 6B].
Figure 6 (A,B):

Mammogram (A) shows a lucent-centered focus (arrow) of dermal calcification. Mammogram (B) shows a larger, lucent-centered oil cyst (arrow)

Mammogram (A) shows a lucent-centered focus (arrow) of dermal calcification. Mammogram (B) shows a larger, lucent-centered oil cyst (arrow)

Calcifications that are of intermediate concern

Amorphous calcifications:

These are very tiny, hazy calcifications [Figure 7] and are often difficult to pick up on CR machines.
Figure 7

Mammogram shows amorphous calcifications (arrow). A hook-wire localization (arrowhead) was performed; the histopathology report did not show any malignancy

Mammogram shows amorphous calcifications (arrow). A hook-wire localization (arrowhead) was performed; the histopathology report did not show any malignancy

Calcifications that are highly suspicious for malignancy

Fine, linear, branching or casting calcifications:

These are linear, rod-like calcifications and are typically seen in malignancy [Figure 8].
Figure 8

Mammogram shows fine, linear, branching calcifications (arrows), typical of malignancy

Mammogram shows fine, linear, branching calcifications (arrows), typical of malignancy

Pleomorphic calcifications:

These are microcalcifications of varying shapes and sizes [Figure 9].
Figure 9

Mammogram shows pleomorphic calcifications (arrows) in this patient with a ductal carcinoma

Mammogram shows pleomorphic calcifications (arrows) in this patient with a ductal carcinoma

According to distribution

Grouped or clustered:

These are five or more than five calcifications seen in a small area of 1 cm3 [Figure 10] and may be seen in benign or malignant conditions. If the cluster is a loose cluster (< 10/cm2), it is more likely to represent a benign condition, whereas a compact cluster (>20/cm2) is more likely to be due to malignant disease.[6]
Figure 10

Mammogram shows clustered microcalcifications (arrows)

Mammogram shows clustered microcalcifications (arrows)

Linear, segmental:

These are suspicious calcifications arranged in a line or showing a branching pattern, suggesting deposits in a duct [Figure 11]. They tend to be distributed in a linear manner because most common malignancies are ductal, beginning in the terminal ducts.
Figure 11 (A,B):

Mediolateral oblique mammogram (A) and magnified view (B) show segmental calcifications

Mediolateral oblique mammogram (A) and magnified view (B) show segmental calcifications

Regional:

Calcifications are seen in a large volume, not necessarily conforming to a duct; more likely to be benign.

Diffuse or scattered:

These calcifications are seen all over the breast and may be bilateral [Figure 12]. They are almost always benign.
Figure 12

Craniocaudal mammograms of both breasts show benign, diffusely scattered microcalcifications (arrows)

Craniocaudal mammograms of both breasts show benign, diffusely scattered microcalcifications (arrows) In conclusion, with the help of morphology and distribution, calcifications can be categorized into benign, of intermediate-concern, and malignant types. It would be more appropriate to categorize them with the help of BI-RADS into 2, 3, 4 and 5.[7] The egg shell, popcorn, lucent-centered, dermal, vascular calcifications, milk of calcium and scattered calcifications are definitely benign and can be categorized as BI-RADS 2. They do not need biopsy or follow-up. Those of intermediate concern can be categorized into 3 and should be closely monitored. Pleomorphic and casting-type calcifications are categorized as BI-RADS 4 or 5 and a biopsy is recommended. In case follow-up is advised, it should be kept in mind that some microcalcifications, sometimes even of DCIS, can remain unchanged for years. Some calcifications are even known to resolve.[8]
  8 in total

1.  Clustering of breast microcalcifications: revisited.

Authors:  J M Park; H K Choi; S J Bae; M S Lee; S H Ahn; G Gong
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification.

Authors:  Meltem Gülsün; Figen Başaran Demirkazik; Macit Ariyürek
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).

Authors:  Xiujiang J Rong; Chris C Shaw; Dennis A Johnston; Michael R Lemacks; Xinming Liu; Gary J Whitman; Mark J Dryden; Tanya W Stephens; Stephen K Thompson; Kerry T Krugh; Chao-Jen Lai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Resolving breast microcalcifications.

Authors:  H Seymour; R Given-Wilson; L Wilkinson; J Cooke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications.

Authors:  Mary Scott Soo; Eric L Rosen; Jessie Q Xia; Sujata Ghate; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jennifer E Ochsner; Kathryn J Fowler; Jason P Fine; Lonie R Salkowski; Daniel L Rubin; Gale A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diagnosis of tumors of the breast by simple roentgenography; calcifications in carcinomas.

Authors:  R LEBORGNE
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther       Date:  1951-01

Review 8.  Evaluation of breast microcalcifications.

Authors:  B S Monsees
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.303

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Breast artery calcification as a predictor of coronary artery calcification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Batool Seifi; Reza Javadrashid; Fatemeh Seifi; Jhila Khamanian; Armin Zarrintan; Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  Efficacy of 'fine' focal spot imaging in CT abdominal angiography.

Authors:  Lawrence Chia Wei Oh; Kenneth K Lau; Ashwini Devapalasundaram; Kevin Buchan; Nicholas Ardley; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Mammographic microcalcifications and breast cancer tumorigenesis: a radiologic-pathologic analysis.

Authors:  Madiha Naseem; Joshua Murray; John F Hilton; Jason Karamchandani; Derek Muradali; Hala Faragalla; Chanele Polenz; Dolly Han; David C Bell; Christine Brezden-Masley
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Improved Diagnostics by Assessing the Micromorphology of Breast Calcifications via X-Ray Dark-Field Radiography.

Authors:  Kai Scherer; Eva Braig; Sebastian Ehn; Jonathan Schock; Johannes Wolf; Lorenz Birnbacher; Michael Chabior; Julia Herzen; Doris Mayr; Susanne Grandl; Anikó Sztrókay-Gaul; Karin Hellerhoff; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.

Authors:  Jieun Byun; Jee Eun Lee; Eun Suk Cha; Jin Chung; Jeoung Hyun Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-04-12

Review 6.  Pathological Mineralization: The Potential of Mineralomics.

Authors:  Elena Tsolaki; Sergio Bertazzo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Loss of Mammographic Tissue Homeostasis in Invasive Lobular and Ductal Breast Carcinomas vs. Benign Lesions.

Authors:  Evgeniya Gerasimova-Chechkina; Brian C Toner; Kendra A Batchelder; Basel White; Genrietta Freynd; Igor Antipev; Alain Arneodo; Andre Khalil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Role of Ultrasound Imaging in the Prediction of TRIM67 in Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhidong Xuan; Ting Ma; Yue Qin; Yajie Guo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.086

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.