| Literature DB >> 19880584 |
Luigi Uccioli1, Anna Sinistro, Cristiana Almerighi, Chiara Ciaprini, Antonella Cavazza, Laura Giurato, Valeria Ruotolo, Francesca Spasaro, Erika Vainieri, Giovanni Rocchi, Alberto Bergamini.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite increased information on the importance of an inappropriate inflammatory response in the acute Charcot process, there has been no previous attempt to define the specific pathways that mediate its pathogenesis. Here, the role played by monocytes was analyzed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The immune phenotype of peripheral monocytes was studied by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis comparing patients with acute Charcot (n = 10) in both the active and recovered phase, diabetic patients with neuropathy (with or without osteomyelitis), and normal control subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19880584 PMCID: PMC2809281 DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Care ISSN: 0149-5992 Impact factor: 19.112
Figure 1Spontaneous cytokine production by monocytes from acute Charcot case subjects and control subjects. Spontaneous (A) and inducible (monocytes stimulated for 18 h by 100 ng/ml LPS) (B) cytokine production was assessed by FACS, as intracellular accumulation on a single-cell basis. Appropriate controls with isotype-matched irrelevant mAbs were carried out and consistently showed <1% of positive cells. For each analysis, 104 monocytes were gated according to scatter characteristics designed to include only viable cells. Fluorescence data were expressed as percentage of positive cells after subtraction of background isotype-matched values. The data represent the means ± SD (error bars). *P < 0.05, with respect to control subjects. **P > 0.005, with respect to diabetic control and healthy subjects.
Circulating cytokines in acute Charcot cases
| Cytokine | Cytokine concentrations in sera (pg/ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute Charcot | Diabetic control subjects | Healthy subjects | |||
| Onset | Recovered | With osteomyelitis | Without osteomyelitis | ||
| TNF-α | 5.2 ± 3.2 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 2.8 ± 2.3 | 2.1 ± 1 | 2.6 ± 1.2 |
| IL-1β | 0.6 ± 0.3 | <0.125 | <0.125 | <0.125 | <0.125 |
| IL-6 | 15.3 ± 7.4 | 7.4 ± 4.2 | 3 ± 2.9 | 5.2 ± 2.7 | 6.7 ± 3.5 |
| IL-4 | <0.25 | <0.25 | <0.25 | <0.25 | <0.25 |
| IL-10 | <0.78 | <0.78 | <0.78 | <0.78 | <0.78 |
Data are means ± SD. TNF-α and IL-6 were detectable in 100% of the samples; IL-1β was detectable in 3 out of 9 acute Charcot patients at the onset time point. The lowest standards were as follows: TNF-α, 0.5 pg/ml; IL-1β, 0.125 pg/ml; IL-6, 0.156 pg/ml; IL-4, 0.25 pg/ml; IL-10, 0.78 pg/ml.
*P < 0.05, with respect to control subjects.
Figure 2Upmodulation of surface molecules in monocyte-macrophages from Charcot patients. The expression of CD40, CD80, and CD86 was analyzed by FACS on CD14+ gated cells in fresh explanted PBMCs. Appropriate controls with isotype-matched irrelevant mAbs were carried out and consistently showed <1% of positive cells. For each analysis, 104 monocytes were gated according to scatter characteristics designed to include only viable cells. Fluorescence data were expressed as mean channel fluorescence (A) and as percentage of positive cells (B) after subtraction of background isotype-matched values. The data represent the means ± SD (error bars). *P < 0.05, with respect to control subjects; **P > 0.05, with respect to diabetic control and healthy subjects.
Figure 3Kinetics of hypodiploid DNA formation in monocyte-macrophages. PBMCs were cultured in medium with no added serum and hypodiploid DNA formation was determined at indicated intervals (A). PBMCs were cultured in medium with no added serum with different LPS concentrations, and hypodiploid DNA formation was determined at 72 h (B). The red fluorescence due to propidium iodide staining of the DNA was registered on a logarithmic scale at >620 nm. The forward and side scatter of particles were simultaneously measured. Cell debris was excluded from analysis by appropriately raising the forward scatter threshold. The residual cell debris had a very low DNA fluorescence emission and a low side scatter signal. At least 104 cells of each sample were analyzed. *P < 0.05, with respect to recovered acute case subjects and control subjects.