Literature DB >> 19880381

NNDB: the nearest neighbor parameter database for predicting stability of nucleic acid secondary structure.

Douglas H Turner1, David H Mathews.   

Abstract

The Nearest Neighbor Database (NNDB, http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/NNDB) is a web-based resource for disseminating parameter sets for predicting nucleic acid secondary structure stabilities. For each set of parameters, the database includes the set of rules with descriptive text, sequence-dependent parameters in plain text and html, literature references to experiments and usage tutorials. The initial release covers parameters for predicting RNA folding free energy and enthalpy changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19880381      PMCID: PMC2808915          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

Nearest neighbor approaches were developed to predict the folding stabilities of nucleic acid secondary structures (1). These parameter sets utilize empirical rules, generally derived from optical melting experimental data, as the basis of the predictions. For RNA, rules exist for predicting both free energy and enthalpy change of Watson–Crick helices, GU pairs and loops (2–5). Parameters for DNA have also been assembled for predicting Watson–Crick pair free energy and enthalpy change and free energy changes of loops (6,7). These parameter sets are the basis of computer programs that predict low free energy secondary structures. Such programs include Mfold/UnaFold (8,9), the Vienna RNA package (10), RNA structure (2), RNAsoft (11) and Sfold (12). Additional approaches that use statistical learning of parameters for RNA folding have also used the rules from the nearest neighbor methods and derived new parameter values (13,14). Nearest neighbor parameter sets include both a set of rules, called either equations or features, for predicting stability and a set of parameter values used by the equations (14). For RNA, separate rules exist for predicting stabilities of helices, hairpin loops, small internal loops, large internal loops, bulge loops, multibranch loops, exterior loops and pseudoknots. Given the number of rules and constraints on the length of journal publications, it is difficult to assemble all the parameters in one publication and provide meaningful tutorials for using the parameters. This is a barrier to software development for novel algorithms that could take advantage of the parameters. For example, many software packages that use RNA parameters still implement the set of parameters assembled in 1999 (4), in spite of the fact the RNA parameters were updated in 2004 (2) based on experimental results. The Nearest Neighbor Database (NNDB) is a web-based tool for assembling and archiving complete nearest neighbor sets, including rules and values. It is available online at http://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/NNDB. It provides documentation of parameter sets and tutorials on how to apply the parameters. Currently, the 1999 and 2004 sets of RNA folding parameters are provided (2–5).

WEBSITE ORGANIZATION

The NNDB is built using a set of static html, specifically XHTML 1.0 transitional pages with a page hierarchy shown in Figure 1. Text is encoded in Unicode (utf-8) to facilitate display of equations in pages with diverse browsers running on diverse operating systems. The top-level page provides access to a help page, available parameter sets and a page of references to RNA optical melting experiments. Additionally, links provide downloading of the whole database in either zip or gzipped tar format. The help page introduces the purpose of the database and defines basic terms, including the set of structural features defined by secondary structures. For example, Figure 2, from the help page, shows an RNA secondary structure that illustrates the loop features covered by nearest neighbor parameter sets. The basic equations for utilizing the parameters to extrapolate folding free energy changes to temperatures other than 37°C and to predict melting temperatures are also provided.
Figure 1.

The webpage hierarchy of the NNDB. This figure illustrates the page hierarchy by following the linked pages down through the 1999 parameters and down to the hairpin loop pages. Note that there are five example calculations for hairpin loops to illustrate the separate sequence-dependent rules that are used depending on the specific loop.

Figure 2.

An RNA secondary structure illustrating the types of features included in nearest neighbor parameter sets. This figure appears on the help page of the website. Loops are composed of nucleotides not in canonical pairs. Hairpin loops have one exiting helix. Internal and bulge loops have two exiting helices. Internal loops have nucleotides not in canonical pairs on each of two strands, but bulge loops have nucleotides not in canonical pairs on only one strand. Multibranch loops, also called helical junctions, have three or more exiting helices. Exterior loops contain the ends of sequences and one or more exiting helices. Pseudoknots are canonical pairs connecting loop regions closed by other helices. Formally, a pseudoknot occurs when there are at least two pairs, with indices i paired to j and i′ paired to j′, that satisfy the condition i < i′ < j < j′. The pseudoknot helix is often considered to be composed of the fewest pairs that need to be removed to relieve the pseudoknot (19). In this structure, the tan nucleotides are in pairs that could be removed to relieve the pseudoknot.

The webpage hierarchy of the NNDB. This figure illustrates the page hierarchy by following the linked pages down through the 1999 parameters and down to the hairpin loop pages. Note that there are five example calculations for hairpin loops to illustrate the separate sequence-dependent rules that are used depending on the specific loop. An RNA secondary structure illustrating the types of features included in nearest neighbor parameter sets. This figure appears on the help page of the website. Loops are composed of nucleotides not in canonical pairs. Hairpin loops have one exiting helix. Internal and bulge loops have two exiting helices. Internal loops have nucleotides not in canonical pairs on each of two strands, but bulge loops have nucleotides not in canonical pairs on only one strand. Multibranch loops, also called helical junctions, have three or more exiting helices. Exterior loops contain the ends of sequences and one or more exiting helices. Pseudoknots are canonical pairs connecting loop regions closed by other helices. Formally, a pseudoknot occurs when there are at least two pairs, with indices i paired to j and i′ paired to j′, that satisfy the condition i < i′ < j < j′. The pseudoknot helix is often considered to be composed of the fewest pairs that need to be removed to relieve the pseudoknot (19). In this structure, the tan nucleotides are in pairs that could be removed to relieve the pseudoknot. For each set of parameters, a first page introduces the available parameters, which vary from set to set. For example, the 1999 RNA rules predict only folding free energy changes (4), but the 2004 rules can be used to predict both folding free energy and enthalpy changes (2,5). For each structural feature, a page defines the basic equations and provides links to parameter values (in plain text and html), references and tutorial pages (e.g. Figure 3). The number of tutorials varies from feature to feature; the set of tutorials is designed to cover each type of rule that can be encountered in practice. For example, the Watson–Crick helix parameters are covered with two tutorials, one for self-complementary and one for non-self-complementary strands. These two tutorials also demonstrate the difference in the calculation when there are terminal AU base pairs, which receive a free energy and enthalpy change penalty (3), because the self-complementary duplex example has two terminal AU pairs and the non-self-complementary case has no terminal AU pairs.
Figure 3.

An example tutorial from the database. This tutorial demonstrates the prediction of folding free energy change for a hairpin loop of six unpaired nucleotides using the 2004 parameters (2,3).

An example tutorial from the database. This tutorial demonstrates the prediction of folding free energy change for a hairpin loop of six unpaired nucleotides using the 2004 parameters (2,3). The individual pages are designed for ease of navigation and clarity. Individual pages above the level of value tables have top banner, a left navigation bar that allows the user to navigate back up the hierarchy to any level above and a bottom bar with the date of last editing. For pages edited after the database has gone online, previous versions of the page are available using this bottom content bar. To facilitate indexing by search engines, all pages have a descriptive title, including the set of parameters to which it belongs (if applicable).

WEBSITE CONTENT

The first release of the NNDB contains the RNA folding rules assembled in 1999 and 2004 (2–5). These rules represent the most recent set of parameters and a prior set that is widely used in software packages. Because folding rules are derived to work as a set, the two versions of rules and values should not be mixed and the website hierarchy reinforces this. The website is designed to be expandable to additional sets of parameters. It is anticipated, for example, that additional pages will be written to include nearest neighbors for DNA folding (6,7) and for predicting RNA pseudoknot stabilities (15–18). Additionally, the values derived from the re-estimation of the values of the 1999 parameter set using the set of known RNA secondary structures will also be included (14).

DISCUSSION

The NNDB is designed to provide a convenient location for assembling parameter sets for predicting the stability of nucleic acid secondary structures. It is modular in design, which facilitates its future expansion to contain additional parameter sets. Furthermore, the web format makes it feasible to provide extensive tutorials for utilizing the parameters, which is generally not possible in print.

FUNDING

The creation of the NNDB was supported by United States National Institutes of Health grants GM076485 to D.H.M. and GM22939 to D.H.T. Funding for open access charge: United States National Institutes of Health.
  17 in total

1.  An approximation of loop free energy values of RNA H-pseudoknots.

Authors:  A P Gultyaev; F H van Batenburg; C W Pleij
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure.

Authors:  D H Mathews; J Sabina; M Zuker; D H Turner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction.

Authors:  Michael Zuker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  RNAsoft: A suite of RNA secondary structure prediction and design software tools.

Authors:  Mirela Andronescu; Rosalía Aguirre-Hernández; Anne Condon; Holger H Hoos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Sfold web server for statistical folding and rational design of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Ye Ding; Chi Yu Chan; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  CONTRAfold: RNA secondary structure prediction without physics-based models.

Authors:  Chuong B Do; Daniel A Woods; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs.

Authors:  T Xia; J SantaLucia; M E Burkard; R Kierzek; S J Schroeder; X Jiao; C Cox; D H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics.

Authors:  J SantaLucia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Improved estimation of secondary structure in ribonucleic acids.

Authors:  I Tinoco; P N Borer; B Dengler; M D Levin; O C Uhlenbeck; D M Crothers; J Bralla
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-11-14

10.  Predicting RNA pseudoknot folding thermodynamics.

Authors:  Song Cao; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  191 in total

1.  Profiling small RNA reveals multimodal substructural signals in a Boltzmann ensemble.

Authors:  Emily Rogers; Christine E Heitsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Enhanced product stability in the hammerhead ribozyme.

Authors:  Irina Shepotinovskaya; Olke C Uhlenbeck
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Multilign: an algorithm to predict secondary structures conserved in multiple RNA sequences.

Authors:  Zhenjiang Xu; David H Mathews
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Structures and Energetics of Four Adjacent G·U Pairs That Stabilize an RNA Helix.

Authors:  Xiaobo Gu; Blaine H M Mooers; Leonard M Thomas; Joshua Malone; Steven Harris; Susan J Schroeder
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Asymptotic distribution of motifs in a stochastic context-free grammar model of RNA folding.

Authors:  Svetlana Poznanović; Christine E Heitsch
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Using structural and evolutionary information to detect and correct pyrosequencing errors in noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  Vladimir Reinharz; Yann Ponty; Jérôme Waldispühl
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  The paradox of dual roles in the RNA world: resolving the conflict between stable folding and templating ability.

Authors:  Nikola A Ivica; Benedikt Obermayer; Gregory W Campbell; Sudha Rajamani; Ulrich Gerland; Irene A Chen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  IPANEMAP: integrative probing analysis of nucleic acids empowered by multiple accessibility profiles.

Authors:  Afaf Saaidi; Delphine Allouche; Mireille Regnier; Bruno Sargueil; Yann Ponty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A Method to Predict the Structure and Stability of RNA/RNA Complexes.

Authors:  Xiaojun Xu; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

10.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Reveals That GU Base Pairs Flanking Internal Loops Can Adopt Diverse Structures.

Authors:  Kyle D Berger; Scott D Kennedy; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.