Literature DB >> 19879802

CMV vaccine trial endpoints.

P D Griffiths1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite some significant challenges, there are several reasons for being optimistic about the prospect of developing vaccines against cytomegalovirus (CMV). The aim of this paper is to anticipate how positive results might be interpreted by those charged with making recommendations about universal immunisation, given that vaccines are normally expected to be highly cost-effective. PERSPECTIVE: The cost effectiveness of a CMV vaccine will be assessed by means of quality adjusted life years gained, so we should design Phase III trials to capture the required evidence directly. Given a vaccine which is equally effective in all age groups at preventing primary CMV infection, immunisation of teenagers will be more cost-effective than immunisation of toddlers, because benefits which accrue in the future are discounted financially. Protection of women of childbearing age against primary infection is important, but may fail to convince sceptics because of the need to extrapolate to protection against transmission of virus to the fetus. The preference of this author is therefore to select congenital CMV infection as the primary endpoint of a Phase III study. We should also ensure that the primary endpoint of a study immunising seronegative women is congenital CMV infection in babies born to those women, not to women in general, because of the large number of babies born to seropositives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19879802     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  5 in total

1.  Rapid Acquisition of Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells with a Differentiated Phenotype, in Nonviremic Hematopoietic Stem Transplant Recipients Vaccinated with CMVPepVax.

Authors:  Corinna La Rosa; Jeffrey Longmate; Chetan Raj Lingaraju; Qiao Zhou; Teodora Kaltcheva; Nicola Hardwick; Ibrahim Aldoss; Ryotaro Nakamura; Don J Diamond
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Update on the current status of cytomegalovirus vaccines.

Authors:  Heungsup Sung; Mark R Schleiss
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.217

3.  Assessment of parental acceptance of a potential cytomegalovirus vaccine for adolescent females.

Authors:  Tiffany J Petty; S Todd Callahan; Qingxia Chen; Kathryn M Edwards; Amanda F Dempsey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Congenital cytomegalovirus reference material: a content analysis of coverage and accuracy.

Authors:  Rosemary Thackeray; Allison Wright; Katherine Chipman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Cytomegalovirus vaccine: phase II clinical trial results.

Authors:  F Rieder; C Steininger
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 8.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.