Literature DB >> 19879793

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: a review with emphasis on cost estimation.

Naresh N Mahamuni1, Yusuf G Adewuyi.   

Abstract

Two things are needed for any technology to be suitable for use in the industry, viz. 1. Technical feasibility and 2. Economical feasibility. The use of ultrasound for waste water treatment has been shown to be technically feasible by numerous reports in the literature over the years. But there are hardly any exhaustive reports which address the issue of economical feasibility of the use of ultrasound for waste water treatment on industrial scale. Hence an attempt was made to estimate the cost for the waste water treatment using ultrasound. The costs have been calculated for 1000 L/min capacity treatment plant. The costs were calculated based upon the rate constants for pollutant degradation. The pollutants considered were phenol, trichloroethylene (TCE) and reactive azo dyes. Time required for ninety percent degradation of pollutant was taken as the residence time. The amount of energy required to achieve the target degradation was calculated from the energy density (watt/ml) used in the treatability study. The cost of treatment was calculated by considering capital cost and operating cost involved for the waste water treatment. Quotations were invited from vendors to ascertain the capital cost of equipments involved and operating costs were calculated based on annual energy usage. The cost was expressed in dollars per 1000 gallons of waste water treated. These treatment costs were compared with other established Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) technologies. The cost of waste water treatment for phenol was in the range of $89 per 1000 gallons for UV/US/O(3) to $15,536 per 1000 gallons for US alone. These costs for TCE were in the range of $25 per 1000 gallons to $91 for US+UV treatment and US alone, respectively. The cost of waste water treatment for reactive azo dyes was in the range of $65 per 1000 gallon for US+UV+H(2)O(2) to $14,203 per 1000 gallon for US alone. This study should help in quantifying the economics of waste water treatment using ultrasound on industrial scale. We strongly believe that this study will immensely help the researchers working in the area of applications of ultrasound for waste water treatment in terms of where the technology stands today as compared to other available commercial AOP technologies. This will also help them think for different ways to improve the efficiency of using ultrasound or search for other ways of generating cavitation which may be more efficient and help reduce the cost of treatment in future. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19879793     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem        ISSN: 1350-4177            Impact factor:   7.491


  14 in total

1.  Eutrophic water purification efficiency using a combination of hydrodynamic cavitation and ozonation on a pilot scale.

Authors:  Wei-Xin Li; Chuan-Dong Tang; Zhi-Lin Wu; Wei-Min Wang; Yu-Feng Zhang; Yi Zhao; Giancarlo Cravotto
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Contaminants of emerging concern: a review of new approach in AOP technologies.

Authors:  Maryam Salimi; Ali Esrafili; Mitra Gholami; Ahmad Jonidi Jafari; Roshanak Rezaei Kalantary; Mahdi Farzadkia; Majid Kermani; Hamid Reza Sobhi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Dynamic modelling of a forward osmosis-nanofiltration integrated process for treating hazardous wastewater.

Authors:  Parimal Pal; Pallabi Das; Sankha Chakrabortty; Ritwik Thakura
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Treatment of persistent organic pollutants in wastewater using hydrodynamic cavitation in synergy with advanced oxidation process.

Authors:  Kassim Olasunkanmi Badmus; Jimoh Oladejo Tijani; Emile Massima; Leslie Petrik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Optimized treatment conditions for textile wastewater reuse using photocatalytic processes under UV and visible light sources.

Authors:  Maria Clara V M Starling; Luiz Augusto S Castro; Rafaela B P Marcelino; Mônica M D Leão; Camila C Amorim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Clay, Zeolite and Oxide Minerals: Natural Catalytic Materials for the Ozonation of Organic Pollutants.

Authors:  Natalia Soledad Inchaurrondo; Josep Font
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Treatment of As(III)-Laden Contaminated Water Using Iron-Coated Carbon Fiber.

Authors:  Dun Fu; Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan; Herong Gui; Songbao Feng; Qian Li; Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Selective and Catalyst-free Oxidation of D-Glucose to D-Glucuronic acid induced by High-Frequency Ultrasound.

Authors:  Prince N Amaniampong; Ayman Karam; Quang Thang Trinh; Kai Xu; Hajime Hirao; François Jérôme; Gregory Chatel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Recent Advances in Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymers: Potential on the Utilization for Sustainable Environmental Remediation.

Authors:  Yusuf G Adewuyi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  Destruction of halogen-containing pesticides by means of detonation combustion.

Authors:  Jolanta Biegańska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.