Literature DB >> 19879094

Characterizing resolution of catheter-associated upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Mark A Jones1, Dae Y Lee, Jocelyn A Segall, Gregory J Landry, Timothy K Liem, Erica L Mitchell, Gregory L Moneta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-associated upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (CAUEDVT) is well known; however, resolution rates and factors affecting resolution of CAUEDVT are not well characterized. This study determined resolution rates and factors associated with resolution of CAUEDVT.
METHODS: From January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2006, 1761 upper extremity venous duplex ultrasound (DU) studies were performed, and a new UEDVT was found in 253 (14.4%). Of these, 150 patients had routine follow-up and 101 had CAUEDVT. Demographics, follow-up DU results, and risk factors for venous thrombosis were recorded in the patients with follow-up studies and CAUEDVT. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for complete thrombus resolution.
RESULTS: There were 49 men (49%) and 52 women (51%) with CAUEDVT and follow-up studies. Mean age was 49 years (range, 5 months-80 years). Patients with CAUEDVT had risk factors for venous thrombosis that included malignancy in 34%, recent surgery/trauma in 34%, known hypercoagulable state in 11%, concomitant lower extremity DVT in 21%, and pulmonary embolism in 5%. Complete resolution of DVT on follow-up was documented in 46%. Thrombosis resolved in only 25% (6 of 24) when the catheter was not removed (P <or= .05). Anticoagulation did not improve the rate of thrombus resolution (P <or= 1.0) compared with catheter removal alone. Of the patients who had thrombus resolution, 75% resolved by 100 days (range, 1-914 days) after catheter removal <or=48 hours of diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, only catheter removal predicted the likelihood of thrombus resolution (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-9.09; P = .025). New-site UEDVT developed in 86% of patients with CAUEDVT who underwent catheter removal and immediate catheter placement in a new site. Pulmonary embolism developed in five patients with CAUEDVT. Of these, three had documented lower extremity DVT as well. No pulmonary emboli were fatal.
CONCLUSIONS: More than half of CAUEDVT resolve <or=113 days when the catheter is removed <or=48 hours of diagnosis. New-site catheter placement has a high rate of new associated UEDVT. Anticoagulation does not appear to augment resolution of UEDVT. Copyright 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19879094     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

1.  Surface modification of a polyethylene film for anticoagulant and anti-microbial catheter.

Authors:  Yingying Zheng; Jianjun Miao; Fuming Zhang; Chao Cai; Amanda Koh; Trevor J Simmons; Shaker A Mousa; Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  React Funct Polym       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.975

2.  Bilateral upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis following central cord syndrome.

Authors:  Hilal Onmez; Havva Turac Cingoz; Sami Kucuksen; Emel Anliacık; Ozan Yaşar; Halim Yilmaz; Ali Salli
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Variability in the management of line-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Rafael Cires-Drouet; Jashank Sharma; Tara McDonald; John D Sorkin; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.740

4.  Deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity caused by central venous port in a patient with soft tissue sarcoma: A case report.

Authors:  Kouji Kita; Tomoki Nakamura; Kouichi Nakamura; Tomohito Hagi; Kunihiro Asanuma; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-23

5.  Prevalence and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Rafael S Cires-Drouet; Frederick Durham; Jashank Sharma; Praveen Cheeka; Zachary Strumpf; Erica Cranston; Cynthia Xu; Minerva Mayorga-Carlin; John D Sorkin; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2021-06-02

6.  Effectiveness and safety of catheter removal alone versus standard anticoagulation therapy after catheter removal for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related thrombosis.

Authors:  Li Liu; Jing Huang; Zhoupeng Wu; Yukui Ma
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

7.  Risk of pulmonary emboli after removal of an upper extremity central catheter associated with a deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Damon E Houghton; Henny Heisler Billett; Manila Gaddh; Oluwatomiloba Onadeko; Gemlyn George; Tzu-Fei Wang; Thein H Oo; Mingen Feng; Mahua Dasgupta; Michael Jaglal; Michael B Streiff; Pippa Simpson; Radhika Gali; Lisa Baumann Kreuziger
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-07-27

8.  Systemic thrombolysis in the upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Roxana Sadeghi; Morteza Safi
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2011
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.