Literature DB >> 19878886

Insight from patients for radiologists: improving our reporting systems.

Annette J Johnson1, Doug Easterling, Linda S Williams, Sharon Glover, Richard M Frankel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to seek patients' perspectives on radiology reporting systems, so that reporting systems can begin to be reorganized and made more patient-centered by giving patients greater access to their personal health information.
METHODS: Focus group methodology was used to explore which aspects of radiology information are important to patients and to identify their preferred means of access to and format of this information. Subjects for the two groups were outpatients who had recently undergone MR imaging at a single academic medical center. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: Most subjects were dissatisfied with current reporting systems, citing delays and a lack of detail as the most important problems. Subjects varied with regard to preferences for who should relay results to them, with some expressing a desire for increased direct input from radiologists because they have greater expertise in imaging interpretation. Most subjects wanted results in writing and in detail, with attached lay language explanations, though a few subjects preferred less detail. Subjects were decidedly in favor of having the option to access results immediately via an online system, proposing some potential problems and potentially multiple benefits of such a system.
CONCLUSIONS: Whatever system revisions are attempted to increase the patient-centeredness of care as regards to radiology reporting, patients will need to be able to choose their preferred levels of access and will need to have the option of accessing full details.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19878886     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

1.  Introduction: quality in diagnostic imaging: learning from worldwide initiatives.

Authors:  Ruth C Carlos; Stacy Goergen
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Patient-directed Internet-based Medical Image Exchange: Experience from an Initial Multicenter Implementation.

Authors:  Giampaolo Greco; Anand S Patel; Sara C Lewis; Wei Shi; Rehana Rasul; Mary Torosyan; Bradley J Erickson; Atheeth Hiremath; Alan J Moskowitz; Wyatt M Tellis; Eliot L Siegel; Ronald L Arenson; David S Mendelson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Patient Understanding of Oncologic Radiology Reports: Is Access to Electronic Medical Records Helpful?

Authors:  Jana Wieland; Kelly Quinn; Katelyn Stenger; Shirley Cheng; Jared Acoba
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Caitlin Farmer; Denise A O'Connor; Hopin Lee; Kirsten McCaffery; Christopher Maher; Dave Newell; Aidan Cashin; David Byfield; Jeffrey Jarvik; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Communicating with patients in the age of online portals-challenges and opportunities on the horizon for radiologists.

Authors:  Christoph D Becker; Elmar Kotter
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-05-04

6.  Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey.

Authors:  Ciarra Halaska; Peter Sachs; Kate Sanfilippo; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist-Patient Interaction.

Authors:  Andrew W Phillips; Rebecca A Landon; Gregory S Stacy; Larry Dixon; Andrea L Magee; Stephen D Thomas; Xi Dai; Christopher Straus
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-17

8.  Understanding patient needs and gaps in radiology reports through online discussion forum analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Alarifi; Timothy Patrick; Abdulrahman Jabour; Min Wu; Jake Luo
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-04-19

9.  Understanding Patient Experiences, Opinions, and Actions Taken After Viewing Their Own Radiology Images Online: Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Evan C Norris; Ciarra Halaska; Peter B Sachs; Chen-Tan Lin; Kate Sanfilippo; Justin M Honce
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-25

10.  Proposed Questions to Assess the Extent of Knowledge in Understanding the Radiology Report Language.

Authors:  Mohammad Alarifi; Abdulrahman M Jabour; Min Wu; Abdullah Aldosary; Mansour Almanaa; Jake Luo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.