Literature DB >> 1987875

The Munich Gallbladder Lithotripsy Study. Results of the first 5 years with 711 patients.

M Sackmann1, J Pauletzki, T Sauerbruch, J Holl, G Schelling, G Paumgartner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of three types of shock wave treatment in patients with radiolucent gallbladder stones.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Single-center trial. PATIENTS: Of 5824 patients with gallstones, 19% were eligible; 711 patients were treated.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as well as adjuvant therapy with bile acids.
RESULTS: Lithotripsy was done in three ways, using a water-tank lithotriptor (group A), a water-cushion lithotriptor at low energy levels (group B), and a water-cushion lithotriptor at high energy levels (group C). The rate of complete fragment clearance 9 to 12 months after lithotripsy was done differed significantly among the three groups: Among patients with single stones of 20 mm or less in diameter, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 76%; for group B, it was 60%; and for group C, it was 83% (P = 0.03). Among patients with single stones of 21 to 30 mm, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 63%; for group B, it was 32%; and for group C, it was 58% (P less than 0.005). Among patients with two or three stones, the rate of fragment clearance for group A was 38%; for group B, it was 16%; and for group C, it was 46% (P = 0.01). Patients with fragments of 3 mm or less 24 hours after lithotripsy was done showed a higher probability of fragment disappearance than did those with larger fragments (P less than 0.001). The clearance rate was higher in patients who were compliant than in those who were noncompliant with bile acid therapy (P less than 0.001). Adverse effects included liver hematoma in 1 patients, biliary pain attacks in 253 patients (36%), mild biliary pancreatitis in 13 patients (2%), and cholestasis in 7 patients (1%). Elective cholecystectomy was done in 16 patients (2%), and endoscopic sphincterotomy was done in 4 patients (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complete disappearance of stones after shock wave therapy depends on the size and the number of the initial stones, the diameter of the largest fragment, and the mode of shock wave treatment. Adjuvant therapy with bile acids appears to be important for complete fragment clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1987875     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-4-290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  32 in total

1.  Successful topical dissolution of cholesterol gallbladder stones using ethyl propionate.

Authors:  A F Hofmann; A Amelsberg; O Esch; C D Schteingart; K Lyche; H Jinich; E Vansonnenberg; H B D'Agostino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Extracorporeal lithotripsy of pancreatic stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pain: a prospective follow up study.

Authors:  T Sauerbruch; J Holl; M Sackmann; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Gallstone ileus successfully treated by shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  M Sackmann; J Holl; M Haerlin; T Sauerbruch; R Hoermann; J Heinkelein; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Repeated piezoelectric lithotripsy for gallstones with and without ursodeoxycholic acid dissolution: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Y Tsuchiya; F Ishihara; G Kajiyama; S Nakazawa; M Otho; H Tanimura; Y Akura; M Harada; M Hihara; Y Kawai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Gallstone recurrence after direct contact dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether.

Authors:  J Pauletzki; J Holl; M Sackmann; M Neubrand; U Klueppelberg; T Sauerbruch; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Gall stone pulverisation strategy in patients treated with extracorporeal lithotripsy and follow up results of maintenance treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid.

Authors:  M Boscaini; M Piccinni-Leopardi; F Andreotti; A Montori
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Lithotripsy of an impacted calcified stone in the cystic duct accompanied by cholecystitis in severe Crohn's disease.

Authors:  U Stölzel; C Koszka; M Gregor; K Ziegler; T Zimmer; E O Riecken
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  R L van der Hul; P W Plaisier; O T Terpstra; H A Bruining
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: epidemiology, etiology, natural history, and outcome predictors in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Miho Sekimoto; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Koichi Hirata; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Masahiko Hirota; Yasutoshi Kimura; Kazunori Takeda; Shuji Isaji; Masaru Koizumi; Makoto Otsuki; Seiki Matsuno
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.