David P Thomas1. 1. Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia. david.thomas@menzies.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Australia, national smoking prevalence has successfully fallen below 20%, but remains about 50% amongst Indigenous Australians. Australian Indigenous tobacco control is framed by the idea that nothing has worked and a sense of either despondency or the difficulty of the challenge. METHODS: This paper examines the trends in smoking prevalence of Australian Indigenous men and women aged 18 and over in three large national cross-sectional surveys in 1994, 2002 and 2004. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2004, Indigenous smoking prevalence fell by 5.5% and 3.5% in non-remote and remote men, and by 1.9% in non-remote women. In contrast, Indigenous smoking prevalence rose by 5.7% in remote women from 1994 to 2002, before falling by 0.8% between 2002 and 2004. Male and female Indigenous smoking prevalences in non-remote Australia fell in parallel with those in the total Australian population. The different Indigenous smoking prevalence trends in remote and non-remote Australia can be plausibly explained by the typical characteristics of national tobacco epidemic curves, with remote Indigenous Australia just at an earlier point in the epidemic. CONCLUSION: Reducing Indigenous smoking need not be considered exceptionally difficult. Inequities in the distribution of smoking related-deaths and illness may be reduced by increasing the exposure and access of Indigenous Australians, and other disadvantaged groups with high smoking prevalence, to proven tobacco control strategies.
BACKGROUND: In Australia, national smoking prevalence has successfully fallen below 20%, but remains about 50% amongst Indigenous Australians. Australian Indigenous tobacco control is framed by the idea that nothing has worked and a sense of either despondency or the difficulty of the challenge. METHODS: This paper examines the trends in smoking prevalence of Australian Indigenous men and women aged 18 and over in three large national cross-sectional surveys in 1994, 2002 and 2004. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2004, Indigenous smoking prevalence fell by 5.5% and 3.5% in non-remote and remote men, and by 1.9% in non-remote women. In contrast, Indigenous smoking prevalence rose by 5.7% in remote women from 1994 to 2002, before falling by 0.8% between 2002 and 2004. Male and female Indigenous smoking prevalences in non-remote Australia fell in parallel with those in the total Australian population. The different Indigenous smoking prevalence trends in remote and non-remote Australia can be plausibly explained by the typical characteristics of national tobacco epidemic curves, with remote Indigenous Australia just at an earlier point in the epidemic. CONCLUSION: Reducing Indigenous smoking need not be considered exceptionally difficult. Inequities in the distribution of smoking related-deaths and illness may be reduced by increasing the exposure and access of Indigenous Australians, and other disadvantaged groups with high smoking prevalence, to proven tobacco control strategies.
Authors: S Thomas; D Fayter; K Misso; D Ogilvie; M Petticrew; A Sowden; M Whitehead; G Worthy Journal: Tob Control Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Sanghyuk S Shin; Xia Wan; Qian Wang; H Fisher Raymond; Huilin Liu; Ding Ding; Gonghuan Yang; Thomas E Novotny Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2013-02
Authors: Suzanne P Moore; David Forman; Marion Piñeros; Sdenka M Fernández; Marceli de Oliveira Santos; Freddie Bray Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Gabrielle B McCallum; Anne B Chang; Cate A Wilson; Helen L Petsky; Jan Saunders; Susan J Pizzutto; Siew Choo Su; Smita Shah Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 3.418