Literature DB >> 19878286

Evolution of digit identity in the three-toed Italian skink Chalcides chalcides: a new case of digit identity frame shift.

Rebecca L Young1, Vincenzo Caputo, Massimo Giovannotti, Tiana Kohlsdorf, Alexander O Vargas, Gemma E May, Günter P Wagner.   

Abstract

Digit identity in the avian wing is a classical example of conflicting anatomical and embryological evidence regarding digit homology. Anatomical in conjunction with phylogenetic evidence supports the hypothesis that the three remaining digits in the bird wing are digits 1, 2, and 3. At the same time, various lines of embryological evidence support the notion that these digits develop in positions that normally produce digits 2, 3, and 4. In recent years, gene expression as well as experimental evidence was published that supports the hypothesis that this discrepancy arose from a digit identity shift in the evolution of the bird wing. A similar but less well-known controversy has been ongoing since the late 19th century regarding the identity of the digits of the three-toed Italian skink, Chalcides chalcides. Comparative anatomy identifies these digits as 1, 2, and 3, while embryological evidence suggests their derivation from embryological positions 2, 3, and 4. Here we re-examine this evidence and add gene expression data to determine the identity of the three digits of C. chalcides. The data confirm that the adult and the embryological evidence for digit identity are in conflict, and the expression of Hoxd11 suggests that digits 1, 2, and 3 develop in positions 2, 3, and 4. We conclude that in C. chalcides, and likely in its close relatives, a digit identity frame shift has occurred, similar to the one in avian evolution. This result suggests that changes in of digit identity might be a more frequent consequence of digit reduction than previously assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19878286     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00372.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  9 in total

1.  Towards the resolution of a long-standing evolutionary question: muscle identity and attachments are mainly related to topological position and not to primordium or homeotic identity of digits.

Authors:  Rui Diogo; Sean Walsh; Christopher Smith; Janine M Ziermann; Virginia Abdala
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Development of the pseudothumb in frogs.

Authors:  Masayoshi Tokita; Noriko Iwai
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Mechanics of evolutionary digit reduction in fossil horses (Equidae).

Authors:  Brianna K McHorse; Andrew A Biewener; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Tracing the evolution of avian wing digits.

Authors:  Xing Xu; Susan Mackem
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  The origins, scaling and loss of tetrapod digits.

Authors:  Aditya Saxena; Matthew Towers; Kimberly L Cooper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Digits lost or gained? Evidence for pedal evolution in the dwarf salamander complex (Eurycea, Plethodontidae).

Authors:  Trip Lamb; David A Beamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distinct patterns of desynchronized limb regression in malagasy scincine lizards (squamata, scincidae).

Authors:  Aurélien Miralles; Christy A Hipsley; Jesse Erens; Marcelo Gehara; Andolalao Rakotoarison; Frank Glaw; Johannes Müller; Miguel Vences
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hand/foot splitting and the 're-evolution' of mesopodial skeletal elements during the evolution and radiation of chameleons.

Authors:  Raul E Diaz; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  New developmental evidence supports a homeotic frameshift of digit identity in the evolution of the bird wing.

Authors:  Luis Ossa-Fuentes; Joao F Botelho; Macarena Ruiz-Flores; Miguel Salinas-Saavedra; Cristian Gonzalez-Cabrera; Alexander O Vargas
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.