L G Wood1, H Powell, P G Gibson. 1. Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, NSW, Australia. lisa.wood@newcastle.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of airway inflammation in asthma is becoming increasingly important, as the inflammatory phenotype underpins the treatment response. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate mannitol as a tool for assessing airway responsiveness and airway inflammation in asthma, compared with hypertonic saline. METHODS:Fifty-five subjects with stable asthma completed ahypertonic (4.5%) saline challenge and a mannitol challenge at two separate visits, performed 48-72 h apart, in random order. RESULTS:Induced sputum was obtained from 49 (89%) subjects during the saline challenge and 42 (76%) subjects during the mannitol challenge (P>0.05). There was a significant correlation between the greatest percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (r=0.6, P<0.0001), the dose-response slope (r=0.73), cumulative dose (r=0.55) and PD15 (r=0.46) for mannitol and hypertonic saline. The greatest percentage fall in FEV(1) to mannitol was less in non-eosinophilic asthma. There was a lower total cell count in mannitol vs. hypertonic-saline-induced sputum. However, sputum eosinophils and neutrophils were not significantly different. Using mannitol, a higher proportion of subjects were classified as having eosinophilic asthma. There were no differences in IL-8, neutrophil elastase or matrix-metalloproteinase 9 concentrations in sputum samples induced with mannitol or hypertonic saline. CONCLUSION: We conclude that mannitol can be used to induce good-quality sputum, useful for analysis of inflammatory mediators and for predicting the inflammatory phenotype in asthma.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Assessment of airway inflammation in asthma is becoming increasingly important, as the inflammatory phenotype underpins the treatment response. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate mannitol as a tool for assessing airway responsiveness and airway inflammation in asthma, compared with hypertonicsaline. METHODS: Fifty-five subjects with stable asthma completed a hypertonic (4.5%) saline challenge and a mannitol challenge at two separate visits, performed 48-72 h apart, in random order. RESULTS: Induced sputum was obtained from 49 (89%) subjects during the saline challenge and 42 (76%) subjects during the mannitol challenge (P>0.05). There was a significant correlation between the greatest percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (r=0.6, P<0.0001), the dose-response slope (r=0.73), cumulative dose (r=0.55) and PD15 (r=0.46) for mannitol and hypertonicsaline. The greatest percentage fall in FEV(1) to mannitol was less in non-eosinophilic asthma. There was a lower total cell count in mannitol vs. hypertonic-saline-induced sputum. However, sputum eosinophils and neutrophils were not significantly different. Using mannitol, a higher proportion of subjects were classified as having eosinophilic asthma. There were no differences in IL-8, neutrophil elastase or matrix-metalloproteinase 9 concentrations in sputum samples induced with mannitol or hypertonicsaline. CONCLUSION: We conclude that mannitol can be used to induce good-quality sputum, useful for analysis of inflammatory mediators and for predicting the inflammatory phenotype in asthma.
Authors: Selma B de Nijs; Niki Fens; Rene Lutter; Erica Dijkers; Frans H Krouwels; Barbara S Smids-Dierdorp; Reindert P van Steenwijk; Peter J Sterk Journal: Respir Res Date: 2011-01-18
Authors: Leon M Straker; Graham L Hall; Jenny Mountain; Erin K Howie; Elisha White; Nigel McArdle; Peter R Eastwood Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Anya C Jones; Niamh M Troy; Elisha White; Elysia M Hollams; Alexander M Gout; Kak-Ming Ling; Anthony Kicic; Stephen M Stick; Peter D Sly; Patrick G Holt; Graham L Hall; Anthony Bosco Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mathias Poussel; Isabelle Thaon; Emmanuelle Penven; Angelica I Tiotiu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 3.390