Literature DB >> 19877251

Intimal dissection of the hepatic artery following transarterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: an intraoperative problem in adult living donor liver transplantation.

Tsan-Shiun Lin1, Yuan-Cheng Chiang, Chao-Long Chen, Allan M Concejero, Yu-Fan Cheng, Chih-Chi Wang, Shih-Ho Wang, Yueh-Wei Liu, Chin-Hsiang Yang, Chee-Chien Yong.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between intimal dissection (ID) in the recipient hepatic artery (HA) and transarterial embolization (TAE) and highlight the reconstructive methods for the different types of ID encountered in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Fifty-four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent LDLT. ID was classified as mild, moderate, or severe, and this classification was based on the extent of intimal injury. Mild, moderate, or severe ID were defined as ID that was less than one-quarter of the circumference of the HA, had reached one-half of the circumference of the HA, or was more than one-half of the circumference of the HA or involved the entire vessel wall, respectively. The reconstructive methods were based on the severity of ID encountered. Forty patients underwent TAE before LDLT, and 23 of these patients (57.5%) had ID. Nine patients had mild ID, 6 had moderate ID, and 8 had severe ID. In the 14 patients who did not undergo TAE, 4 had ID (28.6%; 3 mild and 1 severe). The other 10 patients (71.4%) had normal HA. In mild and moderate ID, the native HA was used after trimming of the HA until a healthy segment was encountered. In severe ID, the HA was reconstructed with alternative vessels. Two HA thromboses occurred postoperatively. TAE increased the risk of developing ID 2-fold. There was no graft loss or mortality in this series due to HA complications. In conclusion, ID of the HA is associated with pretransplant TAE among hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing LDLT. Intraoperative recognition of this complication and trimming until good vessel quality is encountered or using alternative vessels are important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19877251     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

Review 1.  Iatrogenic hepatopancreaticobiliary injuries: a review.

Authors:  Prasanti G Vachhani; Alexander Copelan; Erick M Remer; Baljendra Kapoor
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  What happened in 133 consecutive hepatic artery reconstruction in liver transplantation in 1 year?

Authors:  Tsan-Shiun Lin; Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah Vishnu Prasad; Chao-Long Chen; Johnson Chia-Shen Yang; Yuan-Cheng Chiang; Pao-Jen Kuo; Chih-Chi Wang; Shih-Ho Wang; Yueh-Wei Liu; Chee-Chien Yong; Yu-Fan Cheng
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Asymptomatic hepatic artery dissection early after living-donor liver transplantation with simultaneous splenectomy: two case reports.

Authors:  Keita Shimata; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Tomoaki Irie; Yuzuru Sambommatsu; Masashi Kadohisa; Sho Ibuki; Seiichi Kawabata; Kaori Isono; Masaki Honda; Hidekazu Yamamoto; Taizo Hibi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Case report of hepatic artery dissection secondary to hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lin Ma; Kefei Chen; Qiang Lu; Wenwu Ling; Yan Luo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.