Literature DB >> 19877203

Adenosine restores the hepatic artery buffer response and improves survival in a porcine model of small-for-size syndrome.

Dympna M Kelly1, Xiaocheng Zhu, Hiroaki Shiba, Samuel Irefin, Loris Trenti, Andrei Cocieru, Teresa Diago, Lian Fu Wang, Cristiano Quintini, Zhong Chen, Joan Alster, Shunichi Nakagawa, Charles Miller, Anthony Demetris, John J Fung.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to define the role of the HABR in the pathophysiology of the SFS liver graft and to demonstrate that restoration of hepatic artery flow (HAF) has a significant impact on outcome and improves survival. Nine pigs received partial liver allografts of 60% liver volume, Group 1; 8 animals received 20% LV grafts, Group 2; 9 animals received 20% LV grafts with adenosine infusion, Group 3. HAF and portal vein flow (PVF) were recorded at 10 min, 60 min and 90 min post reperfusion, on POD 3 and POD 7 in Group 1, and daily in Group 2 and 3 up to POD 14. Baseline HAF and PVF (ml/100 g/min) were 29 +/- 12 (mean +/- SD) and 74 +/- 8 respectively, with 28% of total liver blood flow (TLBF) from the HA and 72% from the PV. PVF peaked at 10 mins in all groups, increasing by a factor of 3.8 in the 20% group compared to an increase of 1.9 in the 60% group. By POD 7-14 PVF rates approached baseline values in all groups. The HABR was intact immediately following reperfusion in all groups with a reciprocal decrease in HAF corresponding to the peak PVF at 10 min. However in the 20% group HAF decreased to 12 +/- 8 ml/100 g/min at 90 min and remained low out to POD 7-14 despite restoration of normal PVF rates. Histopathology confirmed evidence of HA vasospasm and its consequences, cholestasis, centrilobular necrosis and biliary ischemia in Group 2. HA infusion of adenosine significantly improved HAF (p < .0001), reversed pathological changes and significantly improved survival (p = .05). An impaired HABR is important in the pathophysiology of the SFSS. Reversal of the vasospasm significantly improves outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19877203     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  10 in total

Review 1.  Small for size liver remnant following resection: prevention and management.

Authors:  Rony Eshkenazy; Yael Dreznik; Eylon Lahat; Barak Bar Zakai; Alex Zendel; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  [Small-for-size: experimental findings for liver surgery].

Authors:  C Eipel; K Abshagen; B Vollmar
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  A critical appraisal of the hemodynamic signal driving liver regeneration.

Authors:  Kerstin Abshagen; Christian Eipel; Brigitte Vollmar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Regulation of hepatic blood flow: the hepatic arterial buffer response revisited.

Authors:  Christian Eipel; Kerstin Abshagen; Brigitte Vollmar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft.

Authors:  Masahiko Taniguchi; Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Satoru Todo; Hiroyuki Furukawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Small for size syndrome following living donor and split liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hector Daniel Gonzalez; Zi Wei Liu; Sophia Cashman; Giuseppe K Fusai
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-12-27

7.  Quantitative study of liver hemodynamic changes in rats with small-for-size syndrome by the 4D-CT perfusion technique.

Authors:  Peiyi Xie; Li Quan; Sidong Xie; Binghui Chen; Kaikai Wei; Jie Ren; Xiaochun Meng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Establishing a Porcine Model of Small for Size Syndrome following Liver Resection.

Authors:  Mohammad Golriz; Maryam Ashrafi; Elias Khajeh; Ali Majlesara; Christa Flechtenmacher; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-29

Review 9.  Immunosuppression for in vivo research: state-of-the-art protocols and experimental approaches.

Authors:  Rita Diehl; Fabienne Ferrara; Claudia Müller; Antje Y Dreyer; Damian D McLeod; Stephan Fricke; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 11.530

10.  Porcine model for the study of liver regeneration enhanced by non-invasive 13C-methacetin breath test (LiMAx test) and permanent portal venous access.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Wittauer; Felix Oldhafer; Eva Augstein; Oliver Beetz; Moritz Kleine; Carsten Schumacher; Lion Sieg; Hendrik Eismann; Kai Johanning; André Bleich; Florian Wolfgang Rudolf Vondran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.