Literature DB >> 19876848

Genetic analysis of reproductive development in tomato.

Rafael Lozano1, Estela Giménez, Beatriz Cara, Juan Capel, Trinidad Angosto.   

Abstract

Besides being an important commercial crop, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) constitutes a model species for the study of plant developmental processes. Current research tends to combine classic disciplines such as physiology and genetics with modern approaches coming from molecular biology and genomics with a view to elucidating the biological mechanisms underlying plant architecture, floral transition and development of flowers and fruits. Comparative and functional analyses of tomato regulatory genes such as LATERAL SUPPRESSOR (LS), SELF PRUNING (SP), SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS (SFT) and FALSIFLORA (FA) have revealed mechanisms involved in shoot development and flowering time which are conserved among Arabidopsis, tomato and other plant species. Furthermore, several regulatory genes encoding transcription factors have been characterized as responsible for singular features of vegetative and reproductive development of tomato. Thus, the sympodial growth habit seems to require a specific control of the developmental fate followed by shoot meristems. In this process, novel genetic and molecular interactions involving SP, SFT and FA genes would be essential. Also this latter, but mainly ANANTHA (AN) and COMPOUND INFLORESCENCE (S) have recently been found to regulate the inflorescence architecture of the tomato. Concerning fruit development, genetic and molecular analyses of new genes such as fw2.2, FASCIATED, OVATE and SUN have proved their contribution to the domestication process and most importantly, their function as key regulators of fruit size and shape variation. Tomato ripening is also being elucidated thanks to the characterization of regulatory genes such as RIPENING INHIBITOR (RIN), NON-RIPENING (NOR), TDR4 and COLORLESS NON-RIPENING (CNR), which have been found to control early stages of fruit development and maturation. At the same time, much research is dedicated to isolating the targets of the ripening regulators, as well as the key genes promoting the parthenocarpic development of tomato fruits. Hopefully, the ongoing sequencing project and the progress made by integrating several research fields will help to unravel the genetic and molecular pathways controlling tomato development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19876848     DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.072440rl

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Biol        ISSN: 0214-6282            Impact factor:   2.203


  21 in total

1.  Genomic organization, phylogenetic comparison and differential expression of the SBP-box family of transcription factors in tomato.

Authors:  María Salinas; Shuping Xing; Susanne Höhmann; Rita Berndtgen; Peter Huijser
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner.

Authors:  Catherine Martel; Julia Vrebalov; Petra Tafelmeyer; James J Giovannoni
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  METHYLTRANSFERASE1 and Ripening Modulate Vivipary during Tomato Fruit Development.

Authors:  Mengqin Yao; Weiwei Chen; Junhua Kong; Xinlian Zhang; Nongnong Shi; Silin Zhong; Ping Ma; Philippe Gallusci; Stephen Jackson; Yule Liu; Yiguo Hong
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Abnormal development of floral meristem triggers defective morphogenesis of generative system in transgenic tomatoes.

Authors:  Inna Chaban; Marat Khaliluev; Ekaterina Baranova; Neonila Kononenko; Sergey Dolgov; Elena Smirnova
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening.

Authors:  Masaki Fujisawa; Toshitsugu Nakano; Yoko Shima; Yasuhiro Ito
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Genetic interactions of the unfinished flower development (ufd) mutant support a significant role of the tomato UFD gene in regulating floral organogenesis.

Authors:  Sandra Poyatos-Pertíñez; Muriel Quinet; Ana Ortíz-Atienza; Sandra Bretones; Fernando J Yuste-Lisbona; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.767

7.  Patterns of sequence polymorphism in the fleshless berry locus in cultivated and wild Vitis vinifera accessions.

Authors:  Cléa Houel; Rémi Bounon; Jamila Chaïb; Cécile Guichard; Jean-Pierre Péros; Roberto Bacilieri; Alexis Dereeper; Aurélie Canaguier; Thierry Lacombe; Amidou N'Diaye; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Marie-Stéphanie Vernerey; Olivier Coriton; Dominique Brunel; Patrice This; Laurent Torregrosa; Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Functional analysis of the Arlequin mutant corroborates the essential role of the Arlequin/TAGL1 gene during reproductive development of tomato.

Authors:  Estela Giménez; Benito Pineda; Juan Capel; María Teresa Antón; Alejandro Atarés; Fernando Pérez-Martín; Begoña García-Sogo; Trinidad Angosto; Vicente Moreno; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Repression of floral meristem fate is crucial in shaping tomato inflorescence.

Authors:  Johanna Thouet; Muriel Quinet; Stanley Lutts; Jean-Marie Kinet; Claire Périlleux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bulk RNA-Seq analysis to dissect the regulation of stigma position in tomato.

Authors:  A Riccini; M E Picarella; F De Angelis; A Mazzucato
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.