Literature DB >> 1987681

The liver transplant waiting list--a single-center analysis.

R D Gordon1, C M Hartner, A Casavilla, R R Selby, O Bronsther, L Mieles, M Martin, J J Fung, A G Tzakis, T E Starzl.   

Abstract

At this transplant center 1340 patients were entered on the liver transplant waiting list during the first 25 months (October 1987 to November 1989) after the initiation of the UNOS allocation system for liver grafts. Of these 972 (72.5%) of the patients received a graft, 120 (9.0%) died waiting for a graft, 109 (8.1%) remained on the active list as of the study endpoint of December 15, 1989, 123 (9.2%) were withdrawn from candidacy, and 16 (1.2%) received a transplant at another center. A total of 1201 patients were candidates for a first graft. Of the 812 primary candidates who received a graft, 64.8% received their graft within one month of entry on the waiting list. Of the 109 primary candidates who died before a graft could be found, 79.0% died within a month of entry onto the waiting list. At time of transplantation, 135 (16.6%) primary recipients of a graft were UNOS class 1, 326 (40.1%) were UNOS class 2, 190 (23.4%) were UNOS class 3, and 161 (19.8%) were UNOS class 4. Actuarial survival rates (percentage) at 6 months for recipients in UNOS class 1, class 2, class 3, and class 4 were 88.7 +/- 2.9, 82.6 +/- 2.1, 78.4 +/- 3.2, and 68.4 +/- 3.9, respectively (P less than 0.001). At the time of death of recipients who failed to get a graft, 6 (5.5%) were UNOS class 1, 14 (12.8%) were UNOS class 2, 23 (21.1%) were UNOS class 3, and 66 (60.6%) were UNOS class 4. These results indicate that a high proportion of liver transplant candidates are in urgent need of a graft and that the UNOS system succeeds in giving these patients high priority. However patient mortality on the waiting list and after transplantation would lessen significantly if more patients with end-stage liver disease were referred to the transplant center in a timely manner before their condition reaches the point where the probability of survival is diminished.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1987681      PMCID: PMC3091381          DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199101000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

1.  Equitable allocation of extrarenal organs: with special reference to the liver.

Authors:  T E Starzl; R D Gordon; A Tzakis; S Staschak; V Fioravanti; B Broznick; L Makowka; H T Bahnson
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  TIMY--a center-oriented transplant information management system.

Authors:  B H Markus; S Mitchell; R D Gordon; B Gillquist; A G Tzakis; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  A microcomputer-based approach to data management: an essential tool in the assessment of trends and results in liver transplantation.

Authors:  R D Gordon; T E Starzl
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.115

4.  Stratifying the causes of death in liver transplant recipients. An approach to improving survival.

Authors:  B W Shaw; R P Wood; R J Stratta; T J Pillen; A N Langnas
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-08
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  A prognostic model for the outcome of liver transplantation in patients with cholestatic liver disease.

Authors:  P Ricci; T M Therneau; M Malinchoc; J T Benson; J L Petz; G B Klintmalm; J S Crippin; R H Wiesner; J L Steers; J Rakela; T E Starzl; E R Dickson
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  The relationship of systemic hemodynamics and oxygen consumption to early allograft failure after liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Takaya; T Nonami; R Selby; H Doyle; G Murray; D Kramer; Y Kang; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.782

3.  Disease gravity and urgency of need as guidelines for liver allocation.

Authors:  B Eghtesad; O Bronsther; W Irish; A Casavilla; K Abu-Elmagd; D Van Thiel; A Tzakis; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  The adverse impact on liver transplantation of using positive cytotoxic crossmatch donors.

Authors:  S Takaya; O Bronsther; Y Iwaki; K Nakamura; K Abu-Elmagd; A Yagihashi; A J Demetris; M Kobayashi; S Todo; A G Tzakis
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.939

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.