BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of malignancy within intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) solely by clinical or radiological findings is not always possible. We sought a correlation between preoperative clinico-radiological findings and outcome. METHODS: A prospective database of pancreatic resections for IPMN (2002-2008) and a retrospective pathological revision of all pancreatic cancer specimens (1995-2001) were analyzed. The patients were grouped into asymptomatic with preoperative diagnosis of IPMN (group 1), symptomatic with a preoperative diagnosis of IPMN (group 2), and those with a preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer whose specimen revealed a background of IPMN (group 3). The groups were compared for demographics, clinical presentation, pathological findings, and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients with IPMN, 19 were in group 1, 23 in group 2, and 20 in group 3. Their median age (range) was 65.6 (46-80), 67 (50-84), and 73.4 (57-86) years, respectively. The clinical presentation for groups 2 and 3 included abdominal pain (56% vs. 32 %), weight loss (8% vs. 52%), obstructive jaundice (4% vs. 57%), pancreatitis (22% and 5%), and new onset of diabetes (14% and 44%). Invasive cancer was found in one patient in group 1 (5.2%), two patients in group 2 (8.7%), and all patients in group 3. IPMN was present in 23 of 217 (10.6%) of all resected pancreatic cancer specimens. Five year survival for patients with invasive disease was 47% and 92% for patients with noninvasive disease (mean follow-up 37.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Benign IPMN can usually be differentiated from adenocarcinoma preoperatively. The clinical presentation is highly indicative of disease course.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of malignancy within intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) solely by clinical or radiological findings is not always possible. We sought a correlation between preoperative clinico-radiological findings and outcome. METHODS: A prospective database of pancreatic resections for IPMN (2002-2008) and a retrospective pathological revision of all pancreatic cancer specimens (1995-2001) were analyzed. The patients were grouped into asymptomatic with preoperative diagnosis of IPMN (group 1), symptomatic with a preoperative diagnosis of IPMN (group 2), and those with a preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer whose specimen revealed a background of IPMN (group 3). The groups were compared for demographics, clinical presentation, pathological findings, and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients with IPMN, 19 were in group 1, 23 in group 2, and 20 in group 3. Their median age (range) was 65.6 (46-80), 67 (50-84), and 73.4 (57-86) years, respectively. The clinical presentation for groups 2 and 3 included abdominal pain (56% vs. 32 %), weight loss (8% vs. 52%), obstructive jaundice (4% vs. 57%), pancreatitis (22% and 5%), and new onset of diabetes (14% and 44%). Invasive cancer was found in one patient in group 1 (5.2%), two patients in group 2 (8.7%), and all patients in group 3. IPMN was present in 23 of 217 (10.6%) of all resected pancreatic cancer specimens. Five year survival for patients with invasive disease was 47% and 92% for patients with noninvasive disease (mean follow-up 37.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Benign IPMN can usually be differentiated from adenocarcinoma preoperatively. The clinical presentation is highly indicative of disease course.
Authors: Suresh T Chari; Dhiraj Yadav; Thomas C Smyrk; Eugene P DiMagno; Laurence J Miller; Massimo Raimondo; Jonathan E Clain; Ian A Norton; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael B Farnell; Michael G Sarr Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F Paye; A Sauvanet; B Terris; P Ponsot; V Vilgrain; P Hammel; P Bernades; P Ruszniewski; J Belghiti Journal: Surgery Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Roberto Salvia; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Claudio Bassi; Sarah P Thayer; Massimo Falconi; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Rebekah White; Michael D'Angelica; Nora Katabi; Laura Tang; David Klimstra; Yuman Fong; Murray Brennan; Peter Allen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-03-27 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Taylor S Riall; Victoria M Stager; William H Nealon; Courtney M Townsend; Yong-fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Jean L Freeman Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-03-23 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Taylor A Sohn; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Ralph H Hruban; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Kurtis A Campbell; Keith D Lillemoe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andrew H Nguyen; Paul A Toste; James J Farrell; Barbara M Clerkin; Jennifer Williams; V Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra R Watson; James S Tomlinson; O Joe Hines; Howard A Reber; Timothy R Donahue Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 3.452