PURPOSE: Keratocyte-to-myofibroblast differentiation is a key factor in corneal wound healing. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of environmental nanoscale topography on keratocyte, fibroblast, and myofibroblast cell behavior. METHODS: Primary rabbit corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts were seeded onto planar polyurethane surfaces with six patterned areas, composed of anisotropically ordered grooves and ridges with a 400-, 800-, 1200-, 1600-, 2000-, and 4000-nm pitch (pitch = groove + ridge width). After 24 hours cells were fixed, stained, imaged, and analyzed for cell shape and orientation. For migration studies, cells on each patterned surface were imaged every 10 minutes for 12 hours, and individual cell trajectories and migration rates were calculated. RESULTS: Keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts aligned and elongated to pitch sizes larger than 1000 nm. A lower limit to the topographic feature sizes that the cells responded to was identified for all three phenotypes, with a transition zone around the 800- to 1200-nm pitch size. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts migrated parallel to surface ridges larger than 1000 nm but lacked directional guidance on submicron and nanoscale topographic features and on planar surfaces. Keratocytes remained essentially immobile. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal stromal cells elongated, aligned, and migrated, differentially guided by substratum topographic features. All cell types failed to respond to topographic features approximating the dimensions of individual stromal fibers. These findings contribute to our understanding of corneal stromal cell biology in health and disease and their interaction with biomaterials and their native extracellular matrix.
PURPOSE: Keratocyte-to-myofibroblast differentiation is a key factor in corneal wound healing. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of environmental nanoscale topography on keratocyte, fibroblast, and myofibroblast cell behavior. METHODS: Primary rabbit corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts were seeded onto planar polyurethane surfaces with six patterned areas, composed of anisotropically ordered grooves and ridges with a 400-, 800-, 1200-, 1600-, 2000-, and 4000-nm pitch (pitch = groove + ridge width). After 24 hours cells were fixed, stained, imaged, and analyzed for cell shape and orientation. For migration studies, cells on each patterned surface were imaged every 10 minutes for 12 hours, and individual cell trajectories and migration rates were calculated. RESULTS: Keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts aligned and elongated to pitch sizes larger than 1000 nm. A lower limit to the topographic feature sizes that the cells responded to was identified for all three phenotypes, with a transition zone around the 800- to 1200-nm pitch size. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts migrated parallel to surface ridges larger than 1000 nm but lacked directional guidance on submicron and nanoscale topographic features and on planar surfaces. Keratocytes remained essentially immobile. CONCLUSIONS:Corneal stromal cells elongated, aligned, and migrated, differentially guided by substratum topographic features. All cell types failed to respond to topographic features approximating the dimensions of individual stromal fibers. These findings contribute to our understanding of corneal stromal cell biology in health and disease and their interaction with biomaterials and their native extracellular matrix.
Authors: Nerea Garagorri; Sara Fermanian; Richard Thibault; Winnette McIntosh Ambrose; Oliver D Schein; Shukti Chakravarti; Jennifer Elisseeff Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Matei S Petrescu; Chonna L Larry; Robert A Bowden; George W Williams; Debjani Gagen; Zhijie Li; C Wayne Smith; Alan R Burns Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sarah A Fraser; Yuk-Hong Ting; Kelly S Mallon; Amy E Wendt; Christopher J Murphy; Paul F Nealey Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: A English; A Azeem; D A Gaspar; K Keane; P Kumar; M Keeney; N Rooney; A Pandit; D I Zeugolis Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Vijaykrishna Raghunathan; Clayton McKee; Wai Cheung; Rachel Naik; Paul F Nealey; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Shinya Watari; Kei Hayashi; Joshua A Wood; Paul Russell; Paul F Nealey; Christopher J Murphy; Damian C Genetos Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Sara M Thomasy; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Hidetaka Miyagi; Alexander T Evashenk; Jasmyne C Sermeno; Geneva K Tripp; Joshua T Morgan; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Lalitha Muthusubramaniam; Lily Peng; Tatiana Zaitseva; Michael Paukshto; George R Martin; Tejal A Desai Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 4.396