Literature DB >> 19875143

Microfoam formation in a capillary.

Spiros Kotopoulis1, Michiel Postema.   

Abstract

The ultrasound-induced formation of bubble clusters may be of interest as a therapeutic means. If the clusters behave as one entity, i.e., one mega-bubble, its ultrasonic manipulation towards a boundary is straightforward and quick. If the clusters can be forced to accumulate to a microfoam, entire vessels might be blocked on purpose using an ultrasound contrast agent and a sound source. In this paper, we analyse how ultrasound contrast agent clusters are formed in a capillary and what happens to the clusters if sonication is continued, using continuous driving frequencies in the range 1-10 MHz. Furthermore, we show high-speed camera footage of microbubble clustering phenomena. We observed the following stages of microfoam formation within a dense population of microbubbles before ultrasound arrival. After the sonication started, contrast microbubbles collided, forming small clusters, owing to secondary radiation forces. These clusters coalesced within the space of a quarter of the ultrasonic wavelength, owing to primary radiation forces. The resulting microfoams translated in the direction of the ultrasound field, hitting the capillary wall, also owing to primary radiation forces. We have demonstrated that as soon as the bubble clusters are formed and as long as they are in the sound field, they behave as one entity. At our acoustic settings, it takes seconds to force the bubble clusters to positions approximately a quarter wavelength apart. It also just takes seconds to drive the clusters towards the capillary wall. Subjecting an ultrasound contrast agent of given concentration to a continuous low-amplitude signal makes it cluster to a microfoam of known position and known size, allowing for sonic manipulation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19875143     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced and targeted ultrasound.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Odd Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Shell properties and concentration stability of acoustofluidic delivery agents.

Authors:  Hussain Alsadiq; Karnaker Tupally; Robert Vogel; Ganesh Kokil; Harendra S Parekh; Martin Veidt
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-01-04

3.  An in vivo validation of the application of acoustic radiation force to enhance the diagnostic utility of molecular imaging using 3-d ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryan C Gessner; Jason E Streeter; Roshni Kothadia; Steven Feingold; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Characterization of the dynamic activities of a population of microbubbles driven by pulsed ultrasound exposure in sonoporation.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Fan; Di Chen; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Contrast-Free Detection of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Michael Liu; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 6.  Cationic gas-filled microbubbles for ultrasound-based nucleic acids delivery.

Authors:  Anthony Delalande; Colette Bastié; Lucie Pigeon; Simona Manta; Matthias Lebertre; Nathalie Mignet; Patrick Midoux; Chantal Pichon
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Temporal stability of lipid-shelled microbubbles during acoustically-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Daniella A Jimenez; Alexander Frank; Alexander Robertson; Lin Zhang; Alina R Kline-Schoder; Vividha Bhaskar; Mitra Harpale; Elizabeth Caso; Nicholas Papapanou; Rachel Anderson; Rachel Li; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-05-06

8.  Sonoporation Using Nanoparticle-Loaded Microbubbles Increases Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles Compared to Co-Incubation of Nanoparticles and Microbubbles.

Authors:  Sofie Snipstad; Sigurd Hanstad; Astrid Bjørkøy; Ýrr Mørch; Catharina de Lange Davies
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 9.  The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.

Authors:  Ali Jangjou; Amir Hossein Meisami; Kazem Jamali; Mohammad Hadi Niakan; Milad Abbasi; Mostafa Shafiee; Majid Salehi; Ahmad Hosseinzadeh; Ali Mohammad Amani; Ahmad Vaez
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 8.410

10.  Superharmonic microbubble Doppler effect in ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; James J Choi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.