Literature DB >> 19867173

DEPRESSION BY ANTIBODY OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO HOMOGRAFTS AND ITS ROLE IN IMMUNOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENT.

G D Snell1, H J Winn, J H Stimpfling, S J Parker.   

Abstract

This paper reports tests of two hypotheses that have been proposed to account for the enhanced growth of tumor homografts in the presence of antiserum reactive with the graft (immunological enhancement). According to the first hypothesis, enhancement is due to some "physiological" alteration in the tumor, induced by its contact with antiserum, which insures its survival despite the hostile response of the host. According to the second hypothesis, antiserum alters the response of the host. By blocking the development of the cellular type of immunity, which is the main agent in graft destruction, it permits the graft to survive. To test hypothesis 1, strain A tumor SaI was passed from A's, and from enhanced B10.D2's, into untreated B10.D2's. The per cent of deaths was essentially the same in both groups (48 and 44 per cent, respectively); there was no evidence that passage through enhanced B10.D2's altered the capacity of the tumor to grow in the foreign strain. Several other groups of mice included in the experiment all confirmed this conclusion. The experiment failed to confirm hypothesis 1. In the tests of hypothesis 2, the effect of isoantiserum on immune responses of both the humoral and cellular type was measured. When antiserum was given together with foreign strain lymphoid cells (antigen), almost no additional antibody was manufactured; in contrast with this, controls receiving foreign cells only produced red cell agglutinating antibody in high titer. The effect of antiserum on the development of immunity of the cellular type was tested by the method of Winn. In this assay, presumptively immune node cells, in various dilutions, are mixed with tumor cells and injected into appropriate mice. Immunity is indicated by inhibited tumor growth. Antiserum given at the same time as a tumor homograft greatly depressed the immunity of the cells expressed from the draining nodes. At 6 days after the graft, the level of immunity of cells from treated mice was 1/24th to 1/32nd that of cells from controls receiving tumor alone. The same sort of depressing effect was noted when the immunizing tissue was foreign thymus or embryo. Antiserum given 1 or more days after the immunizing tissue also resulted in a lower level of cellular immunity (but the assay used in this case was a less critical one). These results provide an adequate explanation of the phenomenon of immunological enhancement, at least as it occurs in the particular test system used in these experiments. Since it is cellular immunity rather than humoral antibody that inhibits the growth of most grafts (transplantable leukemias are an exception), the depression of this immunity by antibody is favorable to the growth of a homograft.

Entities:  

Year:  1960        PMID: 19867173      PMCID: PMC2137227          DOI: 10.1084/jem.112.2.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  17 in total

1.  The immune response and the homograft reaction.

Authors:  H J WINN
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1960-03

2.  Histocompatibility genes of the mouse. II. Production and analysis of isogenic resistant lines.

Authors:  G D SNELL; R B JACKSON
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Immunological enhancement of tumor homografts in mice: a review.

Authors:  N KALISS
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Some reactions of H-2 antibodies in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  P A GORER
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1958-10-07       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Histocompatibility genes of the mouse. I. Demonstration of weak histocompatibility differences by immunization and controlled tumor dosage.

Authors:  G D SNELL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Acceptance of tumor homografts by mice injected with antiserum. II. Effect of time of injection.

Authors:  N KALISS
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1956-03

7.  Acceptance of tumor homografts by mice injected with antiserum. I. Activity of serum fractions.

Authors:  N KALISS; A A KANDUTSCH
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1956-01

8.  COURSE OF PRODUCTION OF AN ISOANTISERUM EFFECTING TUMOR HOMOGRAFT SURVIVAL IN MICE.

Authors:  N Kaliss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Further observations on tumour-enhancing factors: their bearing on the immunological theory of cancer.

Authors:  H N GREEN; R WILSON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1958-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A cellular basis of immunity in experimental Brucella infection.

Authors:  J J HOLLAND; M J PICKETT
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1958-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  16 in total

1.  Biological factors in tissue transplantation.

Authors:  R Y CALNE
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Frontiers in inflammatory bowel disease. The proceedings of a conference sponsored by the McReynolds Foundation. Part 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-06

3.  Induction of immunological tolerance to allogeneic tissues in the canine species.

Authors:  F T Rapaport; K Watanabe; M Matsuyama; F D Cannon; N Mollen; D A Blumenstock; J W Ferrebee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Suppression of experimental allergic neuritis in rats by prior immunization with nerve in saline.

Authors:  J R Lehrich; B G Arnason
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 17.088

5.  Experimental model of serum therapy for metastasized rabbit transplantable tumors (inhibition of metastatic lesions and life-prolongation).

Authors:  K Nakano; H Tokita; H Amemiya; S Suzuki; K Ohmori; Y Kimura; N Tanaka; T Ueno
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1980-06

Review 6.  Harnessing B cells in immunotherapy.

Authors:  Marilia Cascalho; Jeffrey L Platt
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 7.  Non-canonical B cell functions in transplantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Platt; Marilia Cascalho
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.850

8.  Suppression of allergic encephalomyelitis in rats by means of antibrain serum.

Authors:  P Y PATERSON; S M HARWIN
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1963-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  In vitro activation of cellular immune response to Gross virus-induced lymphoma.

Authors:  M Ortiz de Landazuri; R B Herberman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1972-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Cell-mediated cytotoxicity during rejection and enhancement of allogeneic skin grafts in rats.

Authors:  H H Peter; J D Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1972-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.