Literature DB >> 19865817

Radiographic cervical spine osteoarthritis progression rates: a longitudinal assessment.

Frances Vaughn Wilder1, Lissa Fahlman, Robert Donnelly.   

Abstract

Relative to other sites, the cervical spine has received little attention in the osteoarthritis (OA) literature. Using data from a longitudinal study, we provide age-specific progression rates of radiographic cervical spine OA, by gender. Data from cohort subjects (ages 40+) from the Clearwater Osteoarthritis Study were analyzed (N = 707). All study subjects' demonstrated radiographic cervical spine OA at baseline (2+). Lateral cervical spine radiographs were taken biennially. The study outcome was radiographic disease progression. A grade increase of 1, or more, by the Lawrence and Kellgren ordinal scale was considered progression. Incidence rates were calculated as per 100 person-years of observation. We show that the progression rates for cervical spine OA increase with age. For all ages combined, men demonstrated higher rates of progression compared with women. However, among subjects in their forties and fifties, women were more likely to experience worsening of their disease when compared with men. Progression rates were similar for men and women in their sixties (8.2 and 8.0, respectively). Among subjects in their seventies, men demonstrated a significantly higher rate of progression compared with women (12.5 and 8.6, respectively). As the baby-boomer population continues to increase, cervical spine OA progression assessment can be a useful tool for health-care resource planning. Cervical spine OA research offers an abundance of opportunities. Instability as a precursor to the development of cervical spine OA warrants further research. Epidemiological studies addressing demographic differences (e.g., gender, age) in the incidence of cervical spine OA will contribute to the current knowledge base.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19865817     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-009-1216-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  20 in total

Review 1.  The syndromes of degenerative cervical disease.

Authors:  J G Heller
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  The clinical efficacy of low-power laser therapy on pain and function in cervical osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Ozdemir; M Birtane; S Kokino
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Unilateral phrenic nerve paralysis caused by osteoarthritis of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H Mellem; B Johansen; P Nakstad; D Russell; H Seim
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis       Date:  1987-07

Review 4.  Anteroposterior atlantoaxial subluxation in cervical spine osteoarthritis: case reports and review of the literature.

Authors:  V Daumen-Legré; P Lafforgue; P Champsaur; C Chagnaud; T Pham; M Kasbarian; P C Acquaviva
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 5.  The painful arm.

Authors:  J Murtagh
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1990-09

6.  [Neurological causes for wrist pain].

Authors:  J Dvorak
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Neuroradiology of spine degenerative diseases.

Authors:  M Leonardi; L Simonetti; R Agati
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Cervical spondylosis and nerve root lesions. Incidence at routine necropsy.

Authors:  S Holt; P O Yates
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1966-08

9.  Hypertrophic synovitis and osteoarthritis of the cervical facet joint. Report of two cases.

Authors:  R D Snow; W R Scott
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 10.  Cervical spondylosis. An update.

Authors:  B M McCormack; P R Weinstein
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug
View more
  8 in total

1.  Iatrogenic contributions to cervical adjacent segment pathology: review article.

Authors:  Haruki Ueda; Russel C Huang; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-02

2.  Innervation of cervical ventral facet joint capsule: Histological evidence.

Authors:  Srinivasu Kallakuri; Yan Li; Chaoyang Chen; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-02-18

Review 3.  Osteoarthritis of the spine: the facet joints.

Authors:  Alfred C Gellhorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Pradeep Suri
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Trends and patterns of cervical degenerative disc disease: an analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of 1300 symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Michael Repajic; Paul Mgbam; Zoe Fresquez; Jeffrey C Wang; Zorica Buser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Hyperextension-distraction fractures in ankylosing and spondylotic spines: injury profile and treatment results.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Cirillo T; Marcos Gimbernat R; Ignacio Farías M; Gabriel Hernández Vargas; Alejandro Urzúa B; José Vicente Ballesteros P
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on outcomes associated with osteoarthritis : A systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Lovro Markovic; Barbara Wagner; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.275

7.  Patterns of Cervical Disc Degeneration: Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Over 1000 Symptomatic Subjects.

Authors:  Akinobu Suzuki; Michael D Daubs; Tetsuo Hayashi; Monchai Ruangchainikom; Chenjie Xiong; Kevin Phan; Trevor P Scott; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-08-17

8.  Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziying Wu; Xiang Ding; Yilun Wang; Dongxing Xie; Guanghua Lei; Chao Zeng; Jie Wei; Jiatian Li; Hui Li; Tuo Yang; Yang Cui; Yilin Xiong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.