BACKGROUND: Methylmercury is an environmental pollutant that can cause irreversible effects on the development of children. Although there is no doubt that high exposure can cause neurodevelopmental deficits, the threshold that will adversely affect the developing fetus is not well defined. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence of neurodevelopmental risks of methylmercury to the unborn child from maternal fish consumption to define the lowest observable adverse effect hair concentration (LOAEHC). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of all original research reporting on the effects of methylmercury on the human fetus. A literature search was undertaken using SCOPUS, Medline-Ovid, PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. Papers were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) child neurodevelopmental outcome; 2) comparison groups; and 3) methylmercury exposure through fish consumption. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications met these inclusion criteria. Thirty articles reported on longitudinal studies and 18 were cross-sectional studies. Variations in study design precluded formal meta-analysis. Based on an evaluation of these studies, we defined the LOAEHC at 0.3 microg/g of maternal hair mercury. The longitudinal studies yielded a LOAEHC of 0.5 microg/g. CONCLUSION: In the clinical context, the majority of pregnant women consume mercury-containing fish in amounts that are lower than the LOAEHC defined in this study. However, the LOAEHC is in the same order of magnitude of mercury exposure that occurs in significant numbers of women. Hence, although it appears safe to suggest that eating the recommended types and amounts of fish poses no measurable risks for neurodevelopmental deficits, analysis of hair mercury content before pregnancy might be suggested because dietary modification can decrease body content and risk.
BACKGROUND: Methylmercury is an environmental pollutant that can cause irreversible effects on the development of children. Although there is no doubt that high exposure can cause neurodevelopmental deficits, the threshold that will adversely affect the developing fetus is not well defined. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence of neurodevelopmental risks of methylmercury to the unborn child from maternal fish consumption to define the lowest observable adverse effect hair concentration (LOAEHC). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of all original research reporting on the effects of methylmercury on the human fetus. A literature search was undertaken using SCOPUS, Medline-Ovid, PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. Papers were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) child neurodevelopmental outcome; 2) comparison groups; and 3) methylmercury exposure through fish consumption. RESULTS: Forty-eight publications met these inclusion criteria. Thirty articles reported on longitudinal studies and 18 were cross-sectional studies. Variations in study design precluded formal meta-analysis. Based on an evaluation of these studies, we defined the LOAEHC at 0.3 microg/g of maternal hair mercury. The longitudinal studies yielded a LOAEHC of 0.5 microg/g. CONCLUSION: In the clinical context, the majority of pregnant women consume mercury-containing fish in amounts that are lower than the LOAEHC defined in this study. However, the LOAEHC is in the same order of magnitude of mercury exposure that occurs in significant numbers of women. Hence, although it appears safe to suggest that eating the recommended types and amounts of fish poses no measurable risks for neurodevelopmental deficits, analysis of hair mercury content before pregnancy might be suggested because dietary modification can decrease body content and risk.
Authors: Alan Abelsohn; Loren D Vanderlinden; Fran Scott; Josephine A Archbold; Tara L Brown Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Jean-Paul Bourdineaud; Gilles Durrieu; Sandra Layse Ferreira Sarrazin; Wânia Cristina Rodrigues da Silva; Rosa Helena Veras Mourão; Ricardo Bezerra de Oliveira Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Susan M Silbernagel; David O Carpenter; Steven G Gilbert; Michael Gochfeld; Edward Groth; Jane M Hightower; Frederick M Schiavone Journal: J Toxicol Date: 2011-07-13
Authors: Camilla L Lieske; Sara K Moses; Judith M Castellini; Jessica Klejka; Karsten Hueffer; Todd M O'Hara Journal: Acta Vet Scand Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 1.695
Authors: Judy S LaKind; Michael Goodman; Susan L Makris; Donald R Mattison Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2015 Impact factor: 6.393