Prabhleen Singh1, Scott C Thomson. 1. Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Veteran Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review some basic homeostatic principles that are frequently disregarded to provide boundary conditions to test any new theory containing new details. Homeostasis as applied to total body salt is discussed with a linear model for salt homeostasis that is extraordinarily simple wherein total body salt drives the salt excretion. The basics of tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) and its implications for salt homeostasis are then reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in the field discussed include new details on the apical and basolateral transport of sodium chloride (NaCl) in the macula densa cells during TGF response, direct evidence of contribution of TGF to renal autoregulation and the description of vasodilatory adenosine A2b receptors in the 'efferent' TGF response. Finally, recent information about the role of proximal tubular microvilli as mechanosensors in the flow-dependent tubular reabsorption as a mechanism to explain glomerulotubular balance is reviewed. SUMMARY: Notwithstanding the complexity of salt balance at a molecular level, the overall salt homeostasis is simple. Various natritropic nerves and hormones stabilize any disturbance in salt balance. A change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) brought about by these natritropes will be partially counteracted by the impact of TGF on nephron function. Thus, by stabilizing GFR, TGF reduces the usefulness of GFR as an instrument of salt balance, and lessens the efficiency of salt homeostasis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review some basic homeostatic principles that are frequently disregarded to provide boundary conditions to test any new theory containing new details. Homeostasis as applied to total body salt is discussed with a linear model for salt homeostasis that is extraordinarily simple wherein total body salt drives the salt excretion. The basics of tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) and its implications for salt homeostasis are then reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in the field discussed include new details on the apical and basolateral transport of sodium chloride (NaCl) in the macula densa cells during TGF response, direct evidence of contribution of TGF to renal autoregulation and the description of vasodilatory adenosine A2b receptors in the 'efferent' TGF response. Finally, recent information about the role of proximal tubular microvilli as mechanosensors in the flow-dependent tubular reabsorption as a mechanism to explain glomerulotubular balance is reviewed. SUMMARY: Notwithstanding the complexity of salt balance at a molecular level, the overall salt homeostasis is simple. Various natritropic nerves and hormones stabilize any disturbance in salt balance. A change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) brought about by these natritropes will be partially counteracted by the impact of TGF on nephron function. Thus, by stabilizing GFR, TGF reduces the usefulness of GFR as an instrument of salt balance, and lessens the efficiency of salt homeostasis.
Authors: Scott C Thomson; Timo Rieg; Cynthia Miracle; Hadi Mansoury; Jean Whaley; Volker Vallon; Prabhleen Singh Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Beom Jin Lim; Jae Won Yang; Jun Zou; Jianyong Zhong; Taiji Matsusaka; Ira Pastan; Ming-Zhi Zhang; Raymond C Harris; Hai-Chun Yang; Agnes B Fogo Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Eric H J Verschuren; Charlotte Castenmiller; Dorien J M Peters; Francisco J Arjona; René J M Bindels; Joost G J Hoenderop Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Agata Ptaszynska; Kristina M Johnsson; Shamik J Parikh; Tjerk W A de Bruin; Anne Marie Apanovitch; James F List Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Hao Ren; Ning-Yu Liu; Arne Andreasen; Jesper S Thomsen; Liu Cao; Erik I Christensen; Xiao-Yue Zhai Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.240