Literature DB >> 19863880

Prospective studies on applications of a two-cuff Swan neck catheter and a Tenckhoff catheter to Chinese CAPD patients.

J Y Xie1, N Chen, H Ren, X M Huang, P Zhu.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the difference of clinical curative effects of continuous ambulant peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients in China by using a two-cuff Swan neck catheter and a Tenckhoff catheter.
METHODS: 110 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled. They were divided into Group A (Swan neck catheter group, n = 55) and Group B (Tenckhoff catheter group, n = 55). One-year follow-up visits were made and information was recorded. Survival analysis was made by adopting the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: After 12 month follow-up visits, 17 patients had died, 3 had been transferred to renal transplantation, 8 had been transferred to hemodialysis, 3 were transferred to other hospitals, and the remaining 79 patients (71.8%) continued their peritoneal dialysis therapy in our hospital. 26 patients in both groups had peritonitis, with a total of 35 occurrences taking place. The total incidence of peritonitis was 0.32 times/patient year, with the detailed figure of 0.35 times/patient year for Group A and 0.29 times/patient year for Group B respectively (p > 0.05). Regarding mechanical complications of the 2 groups concerned, including catheter tip migration, Omental enwrapment, peritoneal dialysate leakage, skid of outer cuff, incidence of inguinal hernia and bellyache, etc, no significant difference existed between two groups (p > 0.05). The two groups had the same 12-month technical survival rate of 92.73%. The 12-month survival rate for Group A was 86.34% while the corresponding figure for Group B was 80.68% (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Infections, mechanical complications, technical survival rate and patients' survival rate were quite similar, when a Swan neck catheter and a Tenckhoff catheter were used in Chinese CAPD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19863880     DOI: 10.5414/cnp72373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-0430            Impact factor:   0.975


  4 in total

1.  Unintentional Removal of a Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter: A Case Report.

Authors:  H Nakamura; M Anayama; Y Makino; K Tamura; M Nagasawa
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complications and long-term outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stepan Michran Esagian; Dimitrios Spinos; Anastasia Vasilopoulou; Nikolaos Syrigos; Muath Bishawi; Ruediger Wilhelm Lehrich; John Paul Middleton; Paul Vincent Suhocki; Theodore Nick Pappas; Konstantinos P Economopoulos
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Reducing the occurrence rate of catheter dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis: a single-center experience about CQI.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Zuoliang Liu; Jun Liu; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 4.  ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.756

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.