BACKGROUND: Raltitrexed was developed as a direct and specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. Early clinical trials showed similar activity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mainly in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics are summarized and Phase III adjuvant and MCRC trials of raltitrexed are reviewed. RESULTS: Response rates and overall survival with raltitrexed in MCRC are equivalent to 5-FU. Pooled analysis showed relapse free survival was 1 month longer with 5-FU compared with raltitrexed. Grade 3+ toxicity rates with raltitrexed compare favorably with 5-FU. Unexpectedly, however, treatment-related mortality (TRM) was greater with raltitrexed, mainly due to protocol violations. TRM was also greater in the adjuvant trial, leading to its discontinuation. In spite of excess TRM, much of which could have been avoided, overall survival was the same as with 5-FU. Quality of life was variously reported as better or inferior to 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The simple once every 3 week regimen of raltitrexed has not fulfilled its promise. Meanwhile, the field change in MCRC management has left little space for raltitrexed. Withdrawal of the sponsor's support has left raltitrexed without the level of continuing investigation afforded to 5-FU. The use of raltitrexed in Canada is limited to patients exhibiting intolerance - mucosal, hematological and cardiac - to 5-FU.
BACKGROUND:Raltitrexed was developed as a direct and specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. Early clinical trials showed similar activity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mainly in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics are summarized and Phase III adjuvant and MCRC trials of raltitrexed are reviewed. RESULTS: Response rates and overall survival with raltitrexed in MCRC are equivalent to 5-FU. Pooled analysis showed relapse free survival was 1 month longer with 5-FU compared with raltitrexed. Grade 3+ toxicity rates with raltitrexed compare favorably with 5-FU. Unexpectedly, however, treatment-related mortality (TRM) was greater with raltitrexed, mainly due to protocol violations. TRM was also greater in the adjuvant trial, leading to its discontinuation. In spite of excess TRM, much of which could have been avoided, overall survival was the same as with 5-FU. Quality of life was variously reported as better or inferior to 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The simple once every 3 week regimen of raltitrexed has not fulfilled its promise. Meanwhile, the field change in MCRC management has left little space for raltitrexed. Withdrawal of the sponsor's support has left raltitrexed without the level of continuing investigation afforded to 5-FU. The use of raltitrexed in Canada is limited to patients exhibiting intolerance - mucosal, hematological and cardiac - to 5-FU.
Authors: Anna Tochowicz; Sean Dalziel; Oliv Eidam; Joseph D O'Connell; Sarah Griner; Janet S Finer-Moore; Robert M Stroud Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Peter M Wilson; Peter V Danenberg; Patrick G Johnston; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Robert D Ladner Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Jorge C Herrera-Luna; David Díaz Díaz; Alex Abramov; Susana Encinas; M Consuelo Jiménez; Raúl Pérez-Ruiz Journal: Org Lett Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 6.005