Literature DB >> 19862874

In vitro comparison of antimicrobial activity of iodine and silver dressings against biofilms.

R M S Thorn1, A J Austin, J Greenman, J P G Wilkins, P J Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antimicrobial effectiveness of silver- and iodine-containing wound dressings against preformed mature biofilms of pathogenic wound bacteria grown in vitro.
METHOD: Biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were grown within an in vitro flat bed perfusion biofilm model. Mature biofilms were removed and exposed to wound dressings containing either silver or iodine (Aquacel Ag and Iodozyme) within a static diffusion method, for up to 24 hours. This method was designed to reflect certain key features that determine antimicrobial activity within the wound. The numbers of viable bacteria surviving in the biofilms were determined at set time intervals over the test period.
RESULTS: Both test dressings exerted an antimicrobial effect against the target species biofilms, although the iodine dressing was more efficacious under the experimental conditions employed.
CONCLUSION: There are large and potentially significant differences (as measured in vitro) in the effectiveness of wound dressings containing broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents such as silver and iodine against specific types of bacterial biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19862874     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.8.43635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  8 in total

1.  Biofilms and delayed healing - an in vitro evaluation of silver- and iodine-containing dressings and their effect on bacterial and human cells.

Authors:  Katie A Bourdillon; Craig P Delury; Breda M Cullen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data.

Authors:  Aditya Sood; Mark S Granick; Nancy L Tomaselli
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Next science wound gel technology, a novel agent that inhibits biofilm development by gram-positive and gram-negative wound pathogens.

Authors:  Kyle G Miller; Phat L Tran; Cecily L Haley; Cassandra Kruzek; Jane A Colmer-Hamood; Matt Myntti; Abdul N Hamood
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Diabetic foot infection: A critical complication.

Authors:  Jennifer J Hurlow; Gavin J Humphreys; Frank L Bowling; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  The role of Inadine in wound care: a consensus document.

Authors:  R Gary Sibbald; James A Elliott
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Preparation of polyester-based metal-cross linked polymeric composites as novel materials resistant to bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Suhair Saleh; Bassam Sweileh; Sami O Taha; Ruhaifa Mahmoud; Mutasem O Taha
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Radiopaque Hemocompatible Ruminant-Sourced Gut Material with Antimicrobial Physiognomies for Biomedical Applications in Diabetics.

Authors:  Nimmy K Francis; Harpreet S Pawar; Santanu Dhara; Anirban Mitra; Analava Mitra
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Collagen-based wound dressings for the treatment of diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Crystal Holmes; James S Wrobel; Mark P Maceachern; Blaise R Boles
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.168

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.