Literature DB >> 1986227

Differential compartmentalization of plasmid DNA microinjected into Xenopus laevis embryos relates to replication efficiency.

N J Marini1, R M Benbow.   

Abstract

Circular plasmid DNA molecules and linear concatemers formed from the same plasmid exhibit strikingly different fates following microinjection into Xenopus laevis embryos. In this report, we prove quantitatively that only a minority of small, circular DNA molecules were replicated (mean = 14%) from fertilization through the blastula stage of development. At all concentrations tested, very few molecules (approximately 1%) underwent more than one round of DNA synthesis within these multiple cell cycles. In addition, unlike endogenous chromatin, the majority of circular templates became resistant to cleavage by micrococcal nuclease. The extent of nuclease resistance was similar for both replicated and unreplicated templates. Sequestration of circular molecules within a membranous compartment (pseudonucleus), rather than the formation of nucleosomes with abnormal size or spacing, apparently conferred the nuclease resistance. In contrast, most linearly concatenated DNA molecules (derived from end-to-end joining of microinjected monomeric plasmid DNA) underwent at least two rounds of DNA replication during this same period. Linear concatemers also exhibited micrococcal nuclease digestion patterns similar to those seen for endogenous chromatin yet, as judged by their failure to persist in later stages of embryogenesis, were likely to be replicated and maintained extrachromosomally. We propose, therefore, that template size and conformation determine the efficiency of replication of microinjected plasmid DNA by directing DNA to a particular compartment within the cell following injection. Template-dependent compartmentalization may result from differential localization within endogenous nuclei versus extranuclear compartments or from supramolecular assembly processes that depend on template configuration (e.g., association with nuclear matrix or nuclear envelope).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1986227      PMCID: PMC359620          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.299-308.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  51 in total

1.  Tissue-specific expression of actin genes injected into Xenopus embryos.

Authors:  C Wilson; G S Cross; H R Woodland
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vivo studies.

Authors:  M Ryoji; A Worcel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs.

Authors:  D J Forbes; M W Kirschner; J W Newport
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Initiation of replication at specific origins in DNA molecules microinjected into unfertilized eggs of the frog Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  P J Hines; R M Benbow
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Properties of the chromatin assembled on DNA injected into Xenopus oocytes and eggs.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; W Wasserman; A Worcel
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1983

6.  A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription.

Authors:  J Newport; M Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Replication and expression of Xenopus laevis globin genes injected into fertilized Xenopus eggs.

Authors:  M M Bendig; J G Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Persistence, methylation and expression of vitellogenin gene derivatives after injection into fertilized eggs of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  A C Andres; D B Muellener; G U Ryffel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA binding protein from ovaries of the frog, Xenopus laevis which promotes concatenation of linear DNA.

Authors:  M L Bayne; R F Alexander; R M Benbow
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Initiation of DNA replication in nuclei and purified DNA by a cell-free extract of Xenopus eggs.

Authors:  J J Blow; R A Laskey
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  7 in total

1.  Temporal uncoupling of the DNA methylome and transcriptional repression during embryogenesis.

Authors:  Ozren Bogdanovic; Steven W Long; Simon J van Heeringen; Arie B Brinkman; Jose Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Peter L Jones; Gert Jan C Veenstra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  An embryonic demethylation mechanism involving binding of transcription factors to replicating DNA.

Authors:  K Matsuo; J Silke; O Georgiev; P Marti; N Giovannini; D Rungger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-03-02       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Simple, fast, tissue-specific bacterial artificial chromosome transgenesis in Xenopus.

Authors:  Margaret B Fish; Takuya Nakayama; Robert M Grainger
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.487

4.  Molecular analysis of transgenic plants generated by microprojectile bombardment: effect of petunia transformation booster sequence.

Authors:  C M Buising; R M Benbow
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-04

5.  High transgene activity in the yolk syncytial layer affects quantitative transient expression assays in zebrafish Danio rerio) embryos.

Authors:  D W Williams; F Müller; F L Lavender; L Orbán; N Maclean
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Activation of a system for the joining of nonhomologous DNA ends during Xenopus egg maturation.

Authors:  W Goedecke; W Vielmetter; P Pfeiffer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Tracking of microinjected DNA in live cells reveals the intracellular behavior and elimination of extrachromosomal genetic material.

Authors:  Noriaki Shimizu; Fumie Kamezaki; Shiho Shigematsu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.