Literature DB >> 19861896

Automated brain tumor biopsy prediction using single-labeling cDNA microarrays-based gene expression profiling.

Xavier Castells1, Juan Miguel García-Gómez, Alfredo Navarro, Juan José Acebes, Oscar Godino, Susana Boluda, Anna Barceló, Montserrat Robles, Joaquín Ariño, Carles Arús.   

Abstract

AIMS: Gene signatures obtained from microarray experiments may be of use to improve the prediction of brain tumor diagnosis. Nevertheless, automated and objective prediction with accuracy comparable to or better than the gold standard should be convincingly demonstrated for possible clinician uptake of the new methodology. Herewith, we demonstrate that primary brain tumor types can be discriminated using microarray data in an automated and objective way.
METHODS: Postsurgical biopsies from 35 patients [17 glioblastoma multiforme (Gbm) and 18 meningothelial meningioma (Mm)] were stored in liquid nitrogen, total RNA was extracted, and cDNA was labeled with Cy3 fluorochrome and hybridized onto a cDNA-based microarray containing 11,500 cDNA clones representing 9300 loci. Scanned data were preprocessed, normalized, and used for predictor development. The predictive functions were fitted to a subset of samples and their performance evaluated with an independent subset. Expression results were validated by means of real time-polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Some gene expression-based predictors achieved 100% accuracy both in training resampling validation and independent testing. One of them, composed of GFAP, PTPRZ1, GPM6B and PRELP, produced a 100% prediction accuracy for both training and independent test datasets. Furthermore, the gene signatures obtained, increased cell detoxification, motility and intracellular transport in Gbm, and increased cell adhesion and cytochrome-family genes in Mm, agree well with the expected biologic and pathologic characteristics of the studied tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability of gene signatures to automate prediction of brain tumors through a fully objective approach has been demonstrated. A comparison of gene expression profiles between Gbm and Mm may provide additional clues about patterns associated with each tumor type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861896     DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31818f071b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol        ISSN: 1052-9551


  6 in total

1.  Integrated analysis reveals prognostic value and mesenchymal identity suppression by glycoprotein M6B in glioma.

Authors:  Zong Miao; Liangyuan Geng; Lei Xu; Yangfan Ye; Chao Wu; Wei Tian; Ning Liu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Identification of GPM6A and GPM6B as potential new human lymphoid leukemia-associated oncogenes.

Authors:  Cyndia Charfi; Elsy Edouard; Eric Rassart
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 3.  Gene expression profiling of meningiomas: current status after a decade of microarray-based transcriptomic studies.

Authors:  Mads Aarhus; Morten Lund-Johansen; Per Morten Knappskog
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Discovery and validation of DNA hypomethylation biomarkers for liver cancer using HRM-specific probes.

Authors:  Barbara Stefanska; Aurelie Bouzelmat; Jian Huang; Matthew Suderman; Michael Hallett; Ze-Guang Han; Mamun Al-Mahtab; Sheikh Mohammad Fazle Akbar; Wasif Ali Khan; Rubhana Raqib; Moshe Szyf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Proteins associated with pancreatic cancer survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ru Chen; David W Dawson; Sheng Pan; Niki A Ottenhof; Roeland F de Wilde; Christopher L Wolfgang; Damon H May; David A Crispin; Lisa A Lai; Anna R Lay; Meghna Waghray; Shouli Wang; Martin W McIntosh; Diane M Simeone; Anirban Maitra; Teresa A Brentnall
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Development of robust discriminant equations for assessing subtypes of glioblastoma biopsies.

Authors:  X Castells; J J Acebes; C Majós; S Boluda; M Julià-Sapé; A P Candiota; J Ariño; A Barceló; C Arús
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.