Literature DB >> 19861737

Survival for cancer patients in Europe.

Arduino Verdecchia1, Mariano Santaquilani, Milena Sant.   

Abstract

Comparing cancer survival among the European countries is important to evaluate the performance of Health Care Systems and reduce disparities in access to diagnostic and treatment facilities. The EUROCARE project compares survival in Europe since the nineties. The EUROCARE- 4 analysed 2 690 922 adult cancer cases from 83 cancer registries in 22 European countries, diagnosed in 1995-1999, and followed to December 2003. For each cancer site, the European area weighted mean and age-standardised country-specific observed and relative survival by age and sex is computed. Within-country variation in survival is analysed for selected cancers. Survival for most solid cancers, whose prognosis depends largely on stage at diagnosis (breast, colorectal, stomach cancers, and skin melanoma), was highest in Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Iceland, lower in the UK and Denmark, and lowest in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovenia. France, Switzerland and Italy generally had good survival, slightly below that of the Northern countries. For all cancers, five-year survival was very variable also for the different sites mix. Continuing to monitoring cancer survival in Europe is important to reduce differences in access to diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. After publication of EUROCARE results, UK and Denmark developed a National cancer plan to improve time of diagnosis and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita        ISSN: 0021-2571            Impact factor:   1.663


  7 in total

1.  Emphasising the European Union's Commitment to Cancer Research: a helicopter view of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.

Authors:  Jan-Willem van de Loo; Dominika Trzaska; Karim Berkouk; Maria Vidal; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012

2.  Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. The DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

Authors:  E Blank; N Willich; R Fietkau; W Popp; J Schaller-Steiner; H Sack; F Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Patterns of colorectal cancer care in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.

Authors:  Neetu Chawla; Eboneé N Butler; Jennifer Lund; Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

4.  Inter-relationships between the economic and emotional consequences of colorectal cancer for patients and their families: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alan Ó Céilleachair; Liza Costello; Claire Finn; Aileen Timmons; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Kanika Kapur; Anthony Staines; Linda Sharp
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Challenges in organizing effective oncology service: inter-European variability in the example of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Julian Malicki; Wojciech Golusinski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Malignant lymphatic and hematopoietic neoplasms mortality in Serbia, 1991-2010: a joinpoint regression analysis.

Authors:  Milena Ilic; Irena Ilic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Characterization of human gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines established from peritoneal ascites.

Authors:  Bożenna Mytar; Małgorzata Stec; Rafał Szatanek; Kazimierz Węglarczyk; Katarzyna Szewczyk; Antoni Szczepanik; Grażyna Drabik; Jarek Baran; Maciej Siedlar; Monika Baj-Krzyworzeka
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.